Message #112 Next Previous
Letter to TD Board of Directors re: fraud...whoa!!!!
- From: Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger and family
C/o near Onoway, Alberta
To: Mr. A. Charles Baillie August,10th.2001 A.D.Chairman & Chief Executive OfficerThe Toronto-Dominion Bank
Toronto OntarioMr. G. Montegu BlackChairman and PresidentTxibanguan LimitedMr. W. Edmund ClarkPresident & Chief Operating OfficerThe Toronto-Dominion BankChairman & Chief Executive Officer, TD Canada TrustMs. Eleanor R. ClitheroePresident and Chief Executive OfficerHydro One Inc.Mr. Marshall A. Cohen, Q.C.CounselCassels Brock & BlackwellDr. Wendy K. DobsonProfessor and DirectorInstitute for International BusinessJoseph L. Rotman School of ManagementMr. Henry H. KetchamChairman of the Board,President and Chief Executive OfficerWest Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.Mr. Pierre H. LessardPresident & Chief Executive OfficerMetro Inc.Mr. Brian F. MacNeillChairman of the BoardPetro-CanadaMr. Roger PhillipsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerIPSCO Inc.Mr. Edward S. RogersPresident & Chief Executive OfficerRogers Communications Inc.Ms. Helen K. SinclairChief Executive OfficerBankWorks Trading Inc.Mr. Donald R. SobeyChairmanEmpire Company LimitedDr. Michael D. SopkoChairmanInco LimitedMr. John M. ThompsonVice Chairman of the BoardIBM CorporationMr. Richard M. ThomsonFormer Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerThe Toronto-Dominion Bank
Dear Sirs and Madams, Chairman Charlie Baillie, and honorable directors of the board of the Toronto Dominion Bank,
I thank God , your patience and good a faith to be able to present you with this letter of communication.
I am a man created by God and named as Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger, with wife Cheryl and family also of God's fleshly creation. I am a sincere minister of God , and in faith and duty as a function of my calling, as respected and protected by 176 of the criminal code, formed in her majesty's defense of the faith, do testify having been fraudulently exposed to an alleged mortgage and credit line with your corporate institution Canada Trustco #266 and in practicing my faith and honor I have a few questions that will help clarify our alleged relationship. No joinder herein is intended by this letter of Christian abatement and questions.
Firstly my name is mine only, and by faith in God is extremely private and sacred to me and it is not allowed or indeed lawful for anyone corporate body, man or woman or machine to alter my name without my permission. If you choose to act with integrity and you reply in good faith I will only accept mail in that name exactly. For good faith I offer it to you as Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger, along with the repetition of the demand to not alter enter or record my name in any fashion or manner differing from that which I have provided herein. My faith in God and the King James Bible advises me that bearing false witness is a sin and unacceptable in God's eyes. It also states that Usury and coveting is a sin.
My royal rule of law being the King James Bible, is the supreme law of Canada as promised and proclaimed by Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith. This was sworn to and promised by her majesty during her coronation ceremony in 1953 and such rule of law is spoken of in the Canadian constitutional preamble, being the intent of parliament. This is not a disputable fact.
This is a religious issue and my faith requires I inform you again that I believe I was lied to by your institution and by that deception you obtained my promissary note or equivalent financial instrument. It appears that your system of offering to loan that what you do not have is based on deception and fraud and is void abnitio on the face of the record as you failed to fully disclose this pertinent fact to me . It also appears you have altered my name for a financial purpose with intent and according to the RCMP that is fraud as well. Your officials prior with Canada Trustco being Walter Oliveria who noted via letter to me it was beyond the banks control and was in the hands of international financiers. Edmund W.Clark has repeatedly ignored my notices and Affidavit's to not alter my name and has requested no permission of me to assign the alleged loan/mortgage to you, a different institution being a chartered Bank and not a trust company. And being under different laws than the institution that I originally was misinformed by..
You hold no bonafide contract withme as it appears fraud was applied and it is therefore impossible to assign a fraudulently obtained debt to third party without gaining the permission of the so called debtor to modify the contract obtained in fraud so as to transfer it to the third party. No permission in knowledge or good faith was ever obtained from myself as a minister of God or my wife and children who I have power of attorney over. My family's property has been declared a church and in faith I pay no taxes as it is not corroberated in the Bible to do so and is in fact bibliclly resisted and counselled against and at Romans 16:17-20. "Render unto Ceaser that what is Ceasers" is used to give the impression that we should pay tribute money as tax unto Caeser. Caeser was a Roman pagan god self declared. YHWH's council unto those that worship false gods and offer tribute to them is destruction and death. Jesus refused to pay caeser any money as the Gold is God's and he is the only God and we shall put no others before him. We are to not add unto God's laws nor take away from them. Deuteronomy 4: 1-2; 12: 32.
I hope you will appreciate this is not a challenge or a threat just a notice of my faith in God and his law and a request to not discriminate against my faith by attempting to proceed against me in knowledge of my faith and how your so called contract is in violation of that fait and law.
I am looking forward to your acceptance of this offer of good faith, in providing a termination of what ever arrangements you believe you may have with my family's Church property NE 31 -53- 1- W5th in the county known as Lac Ste. Ann Near Onoway in the province of Alberta with the account number of 501981 at the Canada Trustco branch # 266 and in good faith and Christian manner of forgiveness I will offer no procession against you as previously indicated.
If you decide to act in bad faith, and proceed in fraud as the institution you stand for has in the past, I will be put into a defensive position of utilizing the Supreme law of Canada to expose your bad faith and fraudulent actions in a class action suit along with well over 1000 other members of the faith that are aware of your apparently criminal actions of bearing false witness usury, fraud, extortion, theft and religious discrimination..
1.Have I come to an correct point of learning, in fact that I have been taken advantage of and lied to by your institution when I came to your bank formerly known as Canada Trust in 1986 ,asking for a mortgage/loan ?
2. Did your institution lead me to believe you had possession of the money by your advertisement''s and as such offered the impression I was going to get a loan of funds from you or money taken out of, basically, your pocket into mine? Does my inquiry and assumption prove accurate about this arrangement, as it appears that this was not a loan at all but an exchange and a massive swindle at that.?
3.Is this logically deducted with no dispute in math upon the simple fact that before you gave me anything I put down something, some thing of value, my promissory note, a negotiable instrument classified as funds, real value?
4. Did you take that financial instrument and deposit it in your bank in an account you created, then classified it as your asset, that asset you then took to the central Bank of Canada per the bank of Canada act and asked for cash in return for face value of my promissory note? Did you use my promissory note to create the cash? Does this appear to mean by any standard of definition an exchange? Why was this exchange not disclosed in the so called loan agreement I signed as a promissary note? Does this transaction appear to be of a fraudulent nature.
3. Is offering, someone man or woman created by God and living in a country that recognizes that the King James Bible defended by her majesty is the Supreme law, the impression that you were loaning them your money/funds in your possession when in actuality and truth you had no money/funds to loan him until it was created by the one man or woman wishing the alleged and offered loan, by providing their promissory note/funds to your institution, called fraud ?
4.If any truth offered and contained herein is in error this man would demand your attention to the fact you must rebutt with your own evidence of the error of my assertions. Please in good faith and fair communication standing, respond to this letter of faith and request within fourteen days. If no reply is received, we will conclude you are in tacit agreement with our position of fraud on your part and will be providing an offer of settlement to our family and church, or you will be acting in extreme bad faith and will attempt to conduct a criminal conspiracy to defraud me of my property through the courts who I might add will have to provide proof of their allegiance to the Queen and the rule of law and understanding of the meaning of that allegiance..
I invite and in good faith and understanding of the supreme law of Canada, a fully bonafide and understanding sworn allegiant court of dignity along with a members of the BAR that will provide proof of their understood allegiance as I am a Christian minister who in my faith and duty to God and her majesty Queen Elizabeth defender of the faith ,cannot accept nor be compelled to accept a court or alleged agents of her majesty that will not acknowledge their understanding of the oath of allegiance to her majesty and as such the royal rule of law that her majesty stands in defense of along with her allegiant chosen, and by such failure to provide such reasonably requested proof of such understood allegiance, would by such obvious action of refusal to provide such proof to a request by one as myself as a Christian minister of God and in that claiming that authority to make such a request, would and does violate section 337 of the Criminal Code that applies to all government agents and officers of the court.
The subsequent jurisdiction created by such understood allegiance invokes royal law only based upon a tort or harm to another party or their property or a violation of the commandments. I am the harmed party here, not a corporate Vampire.
I would appreciate the letter I have offered with locus standi, replied to in all points addressing them concisely to the point clearly and in the truth and with documented evidence of your assertions. If you fail to reply in good faith I accept your tacit consent of my assertions and answers to my questions in the affirmative as being acceptance by you and await your offer.
Please include all precedent that would indicate that this is indeed a loan and not an exchange that would dispute the Minnesota Credit River Decision of Judge Martin Vincent Mahoney
of December1968 that established that the banks and the Federal reserve are private banks and created money out of thin air and committed fraud.
Thank you very much for your assistance regarding this. This is not to be construed as an evasion tactic but would rather be the defense of my right in all contract to receive the truth in the full and without reservation, for the benefit of myself my family and my heirs, with regards to the content of any contract that would bind me by its performance guarantee.
In light of discovery that there has been a lack of full honest disclosure of what backs the value of the money , who funded the loan, the method the loan was funded and that an exchange was represented as an loan, to what a reasonable man would determine as fair and with locus standi , it would appear again to a reasonable man that such action nullifies that promissary note or equivalent financial instrument, that was fraudulently acquired , in essence from the beginning and leaves the person who funded the loan in a position to collect all the interest that was fraudulently extracted and stolen from them by the one who fraudulently misrepresented themselves as the party funding the loan and having full possession of the funds advertized to be loaned before the party desirous of a loan came along.
I do appreciate the opportunity to address you and the directors of the board at this time and thank you for your full response regardless of your religious opinion and "contra locus standi" business appointed ethics.
Minister of Christ
Dr. Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger
C/o to be called for as general delivery near Onoway in the province known as Alberta
P.s. Included is my religious faith and Identity affidavit for your records and knowledge
In The Matter of the Faith and Identity of
Edward-Jay-Robin: of the family Belanger
I, Edward-Jay-Robin: of the family Belanger, hereinafter referred to as I, a flesh and blood Christian man, a creation of Almighty God, provided with his spirit upon the earth by coming into this world on the 29th day of the month of September in the year of our Lord Jesus Christ, 1952 A.D. in the local of the city of Edmonton,
In the province known as Alberta, in the land known as Canada, and may be contacted at, c/o near Onoway, Alberta, Canada.
I am practicing in my religious faith and belief in God's royal law, being the King James Bible, as defended by her majesty Queen Elizabeth the second, the Christian monarch of the British Commonwealth. I do claim and say that all I say is to the best of my ability and knowledge, accurate and true.
1. I am in faith, relying on her majesty's duty to be in defense of the faith of the King James Bible, in royal style, and as such so that all of her agents by an oath of allegiance are faithful and bear true allegiance with her in defense of the faith.
I do claim that it is the Christian faith and my belief, that God's law of the King James Bible, clearly in a repetitive way, forbids usury.
2. The acts herein cited below are for the reference of those reading this and are the words of mans law with the parliament;
Be it hereby enacted by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows;
The Queen says she gets advice from and with the consent of the Lords Spiritual.
a) CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 states in the preamble: "Whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:
"Whereas Canada recognizes the supremacy of God and the rule of law, being God's law as the supreme Law, as found in the King James Bible and oath sworn and promised by Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith, to uphold and defend with all of her power, during her coronation ceremony in 1953.
b) Exodus 22:25 - "If thou lend money to any of my people that is poor by thee, thou shalt not be to him as an usurer, neither shalt thou lay upon him usury."
Leviticus 23:1-3 - (1) "You shall not spread a false report .You shall not join hands with the wicked to act as malicious witness. (2) You shall not follow a majority in wrong doing; when you bear witness in a law suit, you shall not side with the majority so as to pervert justice; (3) nor shall you be partial to the poor in lawsuit."
Leviticus 25:17, 36, 37 - (17) "Ye shall not therefore oppress one another; but thou shalt fear thy God: for I am the Lord your God. (36) Take thou no usery of him, or increase : but fear thy God; that thy brother may live with thee. (37) Thou shall not give him thy money upon usury, nor lend him thy victuals for increase."
Deuteronomy 23:19 - "Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother, usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury."
Nehemiah 5:7 - "Then I consulted with myself and rebuked the nobles, and the rulers and, said unto them, Ye exact usury, every one of his brother. And I set a great assembly against them."
Nehemiah 5:10 - "I likewise, and my brethren, and my servants, might exact of them money and corn: I pray you, let us leave off this usury."
This is blatent evidence that the law is clear, "A promissory note or equivalent financial instrument is funds." "The one who funded the loan shall be repaid". No interest on a loan is lawful, "A loan is not an exchange." You cannot loan credit!
The Queen gets advise from the Lords Spiritual and Canada recognizes the supremacy of God and the rule of law.
c) The Queen of England is the head of the Church of England Head of the state of Canada and defender of the faith. In approving all the laws in Canada in principle the Queen gets her advise and consent from the Lords spiritual.
Therefore the Queen in defence of the faith cannot commit blasphemy by admitting that mans law is precedenential and supercedent to Gods law contrary to the command of Deuteronomy.
d) Deuteronomy 4:1 "Now therefore hearken, O Israel, unto the statutes and unto the judgements, which I teach you, for to do [them], that ye may live, and go in and possess the land which the LORD God of your fathers giveth you."
4:2 "Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish [ought] from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you."
12:32 "What thing so ever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto nor diminish from it."
What does the supreme law of Canada (rule of law), God's law, the King James Bible have to say concerning taxation?
e) Luke 2:1 Caesar declares all of the world to be subject to his tax. Caesar is a Roman Pagan God.
Deuteronomy 4:1 & 2 states that we are not to add to God's law, or to take away from it. God commands this. Caesar's laws does not supercede God's law and Christians of faith cannot be compelled to obey them.
Romans 16: 17 - 20 "(17) Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them. (18) For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple. (19) For your obedience is come abroad unto all men. I am glad therefore on your behalf: but yet I would have you wise unto that which is good, and simple concerning evil. (20) And the God of peace shall bruise Satan under your feet shortly. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. Amen."
As a Christian I am not to follow man's laws, laws that create offences. The Law clearly tells me to avoid them and their laws and those who would cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine.
Luke 23: 2 - "And they began to accuse him saying, we found this fellow perverting the nation and forbidding to give tribute to Cesar, saying he himself is Christ the King."
We accept that these were simply accusations by the Scribes and Pharisees, but we also know that two of the three are true, so why would the third not also be true. The first accusation, that Jesus was subverting the nation, at least from his accusers perspective, was true. The third accusations that he claimed he was (and indeed was) Christ, a King. Therefore, Jesus refused to pay taxes to a pagan God, and we are to refuse to pay taxes in support of an evil "system", which is not following God's law.
Matthew 22: 21 "Render, therefore, unto Cesar things which are Caesars and unto God, the things that are God's."
When Jesus spoke these words, he simply put Caesar on notice, and informed him for the first time, that everything is not Caesar's.
Proverbs 16: 4 "The LORD hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil."
Nehemiah 9: 6 "Thou, even thou, art LORD alone; thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host, the earth, and all things that are therein, the seas, and all that is therein, and thou preservest them all; and the host of heaven worshippeth thee."
Isaiah 44: 24 "Thus saith the LORD, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the LORD that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself;"
Psalms 8: 4-6 (4) What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him? (5) For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour. (6) Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet:"
There is no doubt that God did not intend for all things to be owned by Caesar, or by any other government. They are to be under the feet, or enjoyed by all men equally.
Deuteronomy 5: 3, 6 - 9 "(3) The LORD made not this covenant with our fathers, but with us, even us, who are all of us here alive this day. (6) I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage. (7) Thou shalt have none other gods before me. (8) Thou shalt not make thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the waters beneath the earth: (9) Thou shalt not bow down thyself unto them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me."
Deuteronomy 6: 17; 24 - 25 "(17) Ye shall diligently keep the commandments of the lord your God, his testimonies, and his statutes, which he hath commanded thee. (24) And the Lord commanded us to do all these statutes to fear the Lord our God for our good always that he might preserve us alive that it is at this day. (25) And it shall be our righteousness if we observe to do all these commandments before the Lord our God as he hath commanded us."
Deuteronomy 7: 9 & 11 "(7) Know therefore, that the lord thy God he is God the faithful God, which keeps covenant and mercy with them that love him, and keep his commandments to a thousand generations. (11) Thou therefore shalt keep the commandments and the statutes and the judgments which I command thee this day to them."
Deuteronomy 8: 11 & 19 "(11) Beware that thou forget not the Lord thy God in not keeping his commandments and his judgments and his statutes which I command thee this day. (19) And it shall be if thou do at all forget the Lord thy God and walk after other Gods and serve them and worship them I testify against you this day that ye shall surly perish."
As a note of faith ,taxation by the CCRA is not lawfully corroborated, implied or directed towards Christians, as found in God's law. In fact, it is obvious that God speaks against taxation when in support of an evil and perverse system such as exists in Canada today.
Obedience to government
What does the supreme law say about subjecting to governmental authority?
f) Romans 13: says God's judges and rulers were ministers of God. Any Minister of God when asked by one, as an act of faith, if they acknowledge the supremacy of God that fails to reply yes, is not God's Minister and is not to be heeded, as they are not of God and God commands not to show obeisance or homage to them. This is inclusive of lawyers who have no understanding what their oath of allegiance means or are in full understanding of God's law as supreme as their allegiance demands and dictates.
1 Peter 2: 13 says that you are to subject yourselves to such rules and rulers, only if they are sent by Him as otherwise would contradict the commands of Dueteronomy 4:1-2;12:32.
John 17:17 Public schools have removed God, and where there is no God, there is no truth.
Roman's 16: 17 Is very specific. If there is any law that creates offences contrary to the doctrine, then we are to mark them and avoid them. A law such as the Highway Traffic Act is a law of man, creating an offence, contrary to the doctrine. The doctrine of God's word gives me, a good and lawful Christian Man, the absolute right to travel, worship, trade, contracts and not be interfered with in any way or deceived by fraudulent methods.
"Redemption" - Is the deliverance from the power of alien dominion and the enjoyment of the resultant freedom"
-Zondervans Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible
"Resistance To Tyrants Is Obedience To God"
Constitution Act, 1982
Application of Charter
32. (1) This Charter applies;
(a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and
(b) to the legislatures and governments of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.
This Constitution Act applies to the government (not to me, as I am not Government) in all its authority vested in God. If they are not allegiant they have no authority even over themselves
3. I cannot be compelled to obey or be bound by any biblically unconstitutional law or a contract that was not fully and truthfully exposed to me, as that is discrimination and extortion against me in that it challenges the basis of my religion as defended by her majesty.
4. It is my belief and understanding that the Queen is the defender of the Faith, that the Queen of England, the Defender of the Faith, defends the Royal rule of law?God's law as the King James Bible as supported by the coronation ceremony of 1953,and as such supports and defends all of my truth herein so declared
The Imperial Acts and the Coronation Oath, etc:
Since the Revolution of 1688, Britain's Crown has by law been specifically reserved for Protestant Monarchs only. The Bill of Rights, and the Act of Settlement make this abundantly clear, and therefore the Accession Declaration demands that every heir to the Throne shall be Protestant, and must swear to defend the Christian faith accordingly.
In the Coronation Service (in the one statutory part of the Service), the Archbishop must administer the Coronation Oath, in which he demands of the Sovereign a promise to govern each country (including Canada) according to their respective laws and customs, but so as to maintain the Laws of God, causing Justice in Mercy to be executed in each country: Where mans law and God's law collide, God's law shall take precedent and supremacy
The Sovereign, with right hand upon the open Bible, must solemnly answer: "All this I promise to do."
The Monarch holds the Government of Scotland under the conditions of the Act of Union and must swear an Oath to preserve the rights of the Protestant Church in Scotland.
Our present Queen, like all other British Monarchs over many centuries, has also sworn these Oaths. The Statute for Settling the Coronation Oath was passed by Parliament at the beginning of the reign of William and Mary, over three hundred years ago.
King George III set the standard for the value, solemnity and lasting application of all Oaths, when he said:
"Where is the power on earth to absolve me from the observance of every sentence of that Oath, particularly the one requiring me to maintain the Protestant Reformed Religion."
"Was not my family seated on the Throne for that express purpose, and shall I be the first to suffer it to be undermined, perhaps overturned? No, No, I had rather beg my bread from door to door throughout Europe, than consent to any such measure.
"I can give up my crown and retire from power. I can quit my palace and live in a cottage. I can lay my head on a block and lose my life, but I cannot break my oath.
"If I violate that oath I am no longer legal sovereign in this country."
In the same way, if a Parliamentarian or a lawyer or a Judge etc. violates his sworn Oath, he is no longer a legal member of Parliament or the BAR. We owe it to our Queen and to ourselves, our children and grandchildren to hold our members of Parliament, and all such proclaimed allegiant agents of her Majesty as may be so appointed to such duty as such allegiance claims, to display honor and integrity in maintaining their oaths. Failing to provide such affirmation of such active oath is to disavow the allegiance. The oath of allegiance it seem's, is no longer being respected by those that take it. This oath is to God. It is a promise to uphold and defend God's law of the King James Bible. A promise to support the Christian Monarch of Canada with true and faithful allegiance to that defense, ,it is not a promise to some powerful foreign masters in the United Nations who demand illicit allegiance with threats of Treaties and International Law and war.
Such disloyal and treasonous Parliamentarians and pseudo allegiants are happy to take us from under the Biblical Law protection of the Christian Monarchy, and put us into slavery under the non-Christian United Nations and the rule of the Babylonian Talmud, the Uniform Commercial Code.
The Coronation Oath:
The Queen having returned to her Chair (her Majesty having already on Tuesday, the fourth day of November, 1952, in the presence of the two Houses of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration prescribed by Act of Parliament), the Archbishop standing before her shall administer the Coronation Oath, first asking the Queen,
Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath?
And the Queen answering, I am willing,
The Archbishop shall minister these questions; and the Queen, having a book in her hands, shall answer each question severally as follows:
Archbishop: Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs?
Queen: I solemnly promise so to do.
Archbishop: Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgments?
Queen: I will.
Archbishop: Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel?
Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law?
Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England?
And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them?
Queen: All this I promise to do.
Then the Queen arising out of her Chair, supported as before, the Sword of State being carried before her, shall go to the Altar, and make her solemn Oath in the sight of all the people to observe the promises: laying her right hand upon the Holy Gospel in the great Bible (which was before carried in the procession and is now brought from the altar by the Archbishop, and tendered to her as she kneels upon the steps), and saying these words:
The things which I have here promised, I will perform, and keep. So help me God.
Then the Queen shall kiss the Book and sign the Oath.
The Queen having thus taken her Oath, shall return again to her Chair, and the Bible shall be delivered to the Dean of Westminster.
The Presenting of the Holy Bible
When the Queen is again seated, the Archbishop shall go to her Chair; and the Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, receiving the Bible from the Dean of Westminster, shall bring it to the Queen and present it to her, the Archbishop saying these words:
Our gracious Queen:
to keep your Majesty ever mindful of the law and the Gospel of God
as the Rule for the whole life and government of Christian Princes,
we present you with this Book,
the most valuable thing that this world affords.
And the Moderator shall continue:
Here is Wisdom;
This is the royal Law;
These are the lively Oracles of God.
Then shall the Queen deliver back the Bible to the Moderator, who shall bring it to the Dean of Westminster, to be reverently placed upon the Altar. This done, the
Archbishop shall return to the Altar.
5. The unlawful use of the Royal Prerogative to
a) suspend or offend against statutes in ways which are prejudicial and detrimental to your sovereignty, contrary to the Coronation Oath Act, 1688;
b) subvert the rights and liberties of your loyal subjects, contrary to the ruling in Nichols v Nichols, 1576.
6. It is my belief and faith that the Queen in all commonwealth countries is the defender of the Christian faith head of the Church of England and head of the state. She is like the biblical figure Melchizadek who was high priest and King in one body. The constitutions of the commonwealth countries all start off saying the Queen got advise and consent from the Lords Spiritual and the Canadian Constitution's preamble says God is Supreme and the rule of law.
Now the Queen as head of the church and defender of the faith cannot commit blasphemy in saying mans law is precedential and supercedent to God's law as the command of Deuteronomy 4:1-2; 12:32, to not add to or take away from God's law is clear.
The Bible is in every courtroom in the commonwealth and the court if asked recognizes the Bible. The judges, prosecutors and officers of the court and police all swore an oath of allegiance to bear faithful and true allegiance to the defender of the faith and to uphold the law of the King James Bible with all their power as being the supreme rule of law of the constitution, as supported by the preamble and her majesty's oath.
7. Good faith Notice of Intent
It is under threat duress and intimidation I offer this notice of the present and future good faith and intent I, Edward-Jay-Robin: of the family Belanger , as a man, a creation of God, born during the month of September on the 29th day in the year 1952 in the local of Edmonton in the Province of Alberta in the Country known as Canada, and now living in the locale of Onoway, Alberta, Canada and may be contacted at c/o Near Onoway; and in the province of Alberta, Canada. I am practicing in my belief in God's royal law as being the King James Bible of Royal heritage of her majesty, Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith. Queen Elizabeth the second of the British commonwealth, is in duty and in faith to be in defence of the faith in royal style, and as such ensure that all of her agents are allegiant to her in defense of the faith.
The Queen in all commonwealth countries is the defender of the faith head of the Church of England and head of the state. (Coronation 1953) She is like the biblical figure Melchizadek who was high priest and King in one body. The constitutions of the commonwealth countries all start off saying the Queen gets her advise and consent from the Lords Spiritual and the Canadian preamble says "Supremacy of God and the rule of law".
Now the Queen as head of the church and defender of the faith cannot commit blasphemy, her allegiance is sanctioned with the same duty in saying man's law is not precedential and supercedent to God's law as the command of Deuteronomy 4:1-2, 12:32 to not add to or take away from God's law is clear.
The Bible is in every courtroom in the commonwealth and the court if asked will recognize it. The judges, prosecutors and officers of the court and police all swore an oath of allegiance and/or affirmation to the defender of the faith and to uphold the Supreme law of Canada, the constitution, section 32 saying it applies to them as supported the preamble. The rule of law is, as defended by her majesty, without argument, is the King James Bible.
8. When a non-allegiant man, woman or person, falsely sworn to the Monarch of Canada, posing as a agent of her majesty a justice, judge, master, or officer of the court as a lawyer, within the form of a court with true allegiance in Her Majesty's authority, proceeds against me without my consent , by force, or by alteration of my identity without my permission, is Treason ,fraud and extortion. The conducting of these activities takes organization and planning and would speak to conspiracy . The use of force or gun's or punitive claims and fraudulent seizure attempts , placing me under threat, duress and intimidation, violating and discriminating against my religious faith and belief and my family, is unconscionable, unlawful, and punishable by the faithfully and truthfully allegiant courts of Federal and International Jurisdictions. The unauthorized and criminal enterprise of exploiting God's court and her majesty's name has proclaimed war upon the people of Canada using the Queen as their Figure head and scapegoat. The claim of a positive answer by the court to the test of the integrity, offered by the claimant would relieve all parties of the confusion caused by the action of a perceived act of treason against the people of Canada by a non allegiant court. As a reasonable man will say, if you do not know the meaning of the allegiance you simply are not allegiant. The man or woman that raised their hand committed perjury when they took the oath if they dids not know what it was about.
It is either that or claim incompetence.
Sac"ra*ment (?), n. [L. sacramentum an oath, a sacred thing, a mystery, a sacrament, fr. sacrare to declare as sacred, sacer sacred: cf. F. sacrament.
9. I am most assuredly not a person as your mans law designates it applies to, God is no respector of persons Deuteronomy 10:17 James 2: 9. Persona from the Latin vulgate means: Actor wearing a mask on a stage. A fiction.
I am created I am flesh blood and bone.
The oath of allegiance taken by Roman soldiers; hence, a sacred ceremony used to impress an obligation; a solemn oath-taking; an oath. [Obs.]
Ecclesiastics 12:13 - Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.
I Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger make claim by affirming that this information with this affidavit is the truth to the best of my knowledge and comprehension.
Affirmed before me near the Town of
Onoway, in the Province of Alberta
this ____ day of _________, 2001.
A Commissioner for taking Affidavits _________________________________
in and for the Province of Alberta Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger