Message #34 Next Previous
Letter: Guy Legault president Canadian Payments Association
June 7, 2005 A.D. To: Guy Legault the private man acting as President of the de facto entity known as the Canadian Payments AssociationFax: 613-233-3385Phone: 613-238-4173 From: Minister Edward-Jay-Robin BelangerChurch of the Ecumenical Redemption InternationalGeneral deliveryAlida, Saskatchewan No code non commercial Dear Guy Legault: I spoke with you a few days ago with regards to a religious matter and told you I would be forwarding you some proof of our religious position. I hope it is not your intent to discriminate against our Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International because we use factual terminology right off of the Governor Generals website. She states she is Canada's de facto head of state. I am performing an official function of my calling as Gods minister in contacting you to warn you of the fraud you may be involving yourself in if you do not understand the Canadian Bills of Exchange act. Most people if they do not understand something cling to what they know and even accuse the party providing the information of being crazy or deluded or attempting a criminal act. This just proves that assumptions can be very dangerous if you are wrong. You like all Canadians have been aware that corruption exists in government but cannot prove it. You know it is a fact of life that corruption is all around us but have no real proof or have never really attempted to get that proof. If you did you would likely go to the source of a lot of that corruption for advise. When a lawyer instructs you to ignore the law you must ask what authority he relies upon lest you rely on faulty advise. If a lawyer instructs you to intimidate and join in the extortion being perpetrated by a provable de facto government then you may wish to question why he would encourage the ignorance of the law. The Bill of Exchange act runs the government of Canada and all of the provinces as everything is a bill of exchange that ultimately ends up with treasury.. The government simply could not operate without bills of exchange and rules for their lawful application. If you discover that something acting as a bill is unlawful but are compelled by intimidation to involve yourself then the payment required by that unlawful act can be made under protest. That is what section 55.56,57, 151,and 152 in the bills of exchange act cover. It is to prevent criminals or criminal organizations, who have usurped the lawful power away from the rightful lawful authority, from obtaining bills of exchange that were achieved by threat and duress and intimidation. No animus furundi nor mens rea is involved in this as it is a protest of religious honor compelled by God as of the real beliefs and understanding of the ministerial protestant. Holder in Due Course 55. (1) A holder in due course is a holder who has taken a bill, complete and regular on the face of it, under the following conditions, namely,(a) that he became the holder of it before it was overdue and without notice that it had been previously dishonoured, if such was the fact; and(b) that he took the bill in good faith and for value, and that at the time the bill was negotiated to him he had no notice of any defect in the title of the person who negotiated it.56. A holder, whether for value or not, who derives his title to a bill through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting it, has all the rights of that holder in due course as regards the acceptor and all parties to the bill prior to that holder.R.S., c. B-5, s. 57.57. (1) Every party whose signature appears on a bill is, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, deemed to have become a party thereto for value.2) Every holder of a bill is, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, deemed to be a holder in due course, but if, in an action on a bill, it is admitted or proved that the acceptance, issue or subsequent negotiation of the bill is affected with fraud, duress or force and fear, or illegality, the burden of proof that he is the holder in due course is on him, unless and until he proves that, subsequent to the alleged fraud or illegality, value has in good faith been given for the bill by some other holder in due course.R.S., c. B-5, s. 58.121. A protest must contain a copy of the bill, or the original bill may be annexed thereto, must be signed by the notary making it and must specify(a) the person at whose request the bill is protested;(b) the place and date of protest;(c) the cause or reason for protest; and(d) the demand made and the answer given, if any, or the fact that the drawee or acceptor could not be found.133. Where a bill is dishonoured, the measure of damages, which shall be deemed to be liquidated damages, are(a) the amount of the bill;(b) interest thereon from the time of presentment for payment, if the bill is payable on demand, and from the maturity of the bill in any other case; and(c) the expenses of noting and protesting. This is a serious religious matter involved here that I wish you to be privately aware of and I am in my duty as a minister am in duty bringing to your attention this issue concerning a recent purchase of a postal money order in the amount of $58.69 May 31/05 in Alida Alberta By minister Stuart Frederick Leis The money order was tendered under protest for payment for registered mail and was offered under protest of threat duress and intimidation. The intial offer was refused by the employee of Canada Post Alida. It was only after the bank approved the threatened offer that also mentioned on it is Ezra 7: 23-25 and Ezekiel 33: 6 from the Holy Bible and Sections 151 & 152 and in omission that I am making you aware of now the above quoted sections of the Bills of Exchange Act that it was finally accepted. We had no way to mail those letters unless we could prove we were being intimidated to pay for the action of performing a function of our calling. We were being obstructed from performing our duty as ministers by being forced to pay a de facto government our money. It is a violation of our faith. This may seem strange to you but it is biblical to us.We do not consider this as frivolous or vexatious nor even mischief but rather as performing functions of our calling in not serving nor joining with mammon as is a de facto government by all definition inclusive but not limited to the Creditors definition as well as the Governor General of Canada's admission she is de facto. The creditor being the world Bank OP 7.30July 2001
These policies were prepared for use by World Bank staff and are not necessarily a complete treatment of the subject.
Dealings with De Facto Governments
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Note:This OP 7.30 replaces OP 7.30, dated November 1994. Questions may be addressed to the Chief Counsel, Operations Policy.___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. A "de facto government" comes into, or remains in, power by means not provided for in the country's constitution, such as a coup d'état, revolution, usurpation, abrogation or suspension of the constitution. You may also wish to see the law dictionaries definition of de facto. De FactoDe facto. [L.] actually; in fact; existing; as a king de facto, distinguished from a king de jure, or by right. American Dictionary of the English Language, Noah Webster 1828, Vol. I, page 56. DE FACTO. Actually; in fact; in deed. A term used to denote a thing actually done. A government de facto signifies one completely, through only temporarily, established in the place of the lawful government; Thomas v. Taylor, 42 Miss. 651, 2 Am. Rep. 625, Chisholm v. Coleman, 43 Ala. 204, 94 Am. Dec. 677, See De Jure Austin, Jur. Lect. vi. p. 336. Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Third Revision (8th Edition)(1914), Volume 1, page 761. de facto (de fakto). In fact, as distinguished from by right. Law Dictionary, James A. Ballentine, Second Edition, 1948, page 344. de facto government. A government wherein all the attributes of sovereignty have, by usurpation, been transferred from those who had been legally invested with them to others, who, sustained by a power above the forms of law, claim to act and do act in their stead. 30 Am Jur 181. Law Dictionary, James A. Ballentine, Second Edition, 1948, page 345. De facto. In fact; actually; indeed; in reality. Ridout v. State, 161 Tenn. 248, 30 S.W.2d 255, 257, 71 A.L.R. 830. Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition (1951) page 504. De facto government. One that maintains itself by a display of force against the will of the rightful legal government and is successful, at least temporarily, in overturning the institutions of the rightful legal government by setting up its own in lieu thereof. Wortham v. Walker, 133 Tex. 255, 128 S.W.2d 1138, 1145. Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition (1951) page 504. de facto (de fakto-). [[L]] existing or being such in actual fact though not by legal establishment, official recognition, etc. [de facto government]: cf. de jure. Webster's New World Dictionary, 3rd College Ed. (1988), page 360. What is the Governor General's position in Government?Canada is a parliamentary democracy and a constitutional monarchy. This means Canadians recognize The Queen as our Head of State. Canada's 26th Governor General, the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson, carries out Her Majesty's duties in Canada on a daily basis and is Canada's de facto Head of State.The first command of God is to not bow to false God's. that is what de facto means. We cannot submit to false gods!!! Exodus 20:3-5An Ecclesiastical Religious Notice also appears on the face of the bill indicative of the honor in it's origin and the performance of an official religious function.It was done in this manner because minister Leis is protesting bowing down and submitting to and paying a de facto currency created by a de facto false god government to a false god government .He had no choice in the matter but to use this de facto system as that is all we have at this time in order to use the registered mail. If it is your intention to aid and abet the unlawful process and redeem this lawfully protested money order, offered by one of our ministers performing a function of his calling after what you have been shown and told about this situation, I need to know what law you are relying on to do this aiding abetting the crime of intimidation and extortion. I am not joking about the intimidation as once we as men of faith become aware that the money has no gold to back it and found out it is backed by flesh we know I we have to extract our souls from the system as of the advise of Jesus himself. Matthew 6:24 This notarial act of honor in standing in the light of God's law and commands and refusing to voluntarily participate in the fraud of fiat currency is done purely in the official performance of what I believe to be the calling of my God. If you have authority to obstruct our ministers or tell our ministers how to carry out the functions of their calling unto God's desire I expect the certified act of parliament that allows you to abrogate any of my religious freedoms to be forthcoming. If not I also expect for you in honor to tell me why you would support the redemption of a bill clearly and with reasons provided that was obtained under threat duress and intimidation when the substantiation for that claim has been made clear to you by Minister Leis's communication to you. See section 126 for violating an act of Parliament. I wish you to know in extension of his faithful effort that I know and do make you aware of my witness to this event as attesting to the fact that Minister Leis was indeed under the real threat and feeling quite uncomfortable as of the realization an officer of one of her majesty's corporations is going to fail in his duty as of intent and encourage the intimidation to continue and approve of it by redeeming the offer made under the proclaimed and detailed religious protest. Section 180 of the Criminal code deals with that. Intimidation is 423 and Obstructing a minister is 176. Only those who have faith exercise it . Maybe that is why you have never heard of this before. Not to many folk really have the faith to exercise and common sense is not that common I hope you will address this matter expeditiously and in honor of what you have just revealed to you concerning the clearance of the money order, and thank you for your time and attention. It is our sincerest wishes that the blessing of God's wisdom befalls you in times of need Minister Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger Christ's bondservant,