Message #44      Next      Previous
what you can send to real folk as errant public officials
  -  Demand Notice

Dear private man or woman acting as a Public Servant or officer of the court,

This letter of Christian faith is to let you know as a man or a woman that I, Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger am of the Christian faith , belief and ministry and hold the King James Bible as the supreme rule of law and God's word. I intend no discrimination of your own faith by this letter but would ensure my own defense against discrimination by such truthful and open communication.
I am, in following my faith and as a Christian minister, not subject to men's laws but am obedient unto all men in God's law. Romans 16:17-20; Corinthians 8:15-19;11:1-2.

I as a minister have come to be aware of corruption within the governing bodies of this land. Because of this knowledge I must ensure I do not deal with them as they are imposters. I must be sure of their true status. I intend no disrespect by this letter of demand only clarity and integrity.

The Queens Coronation Act of 1688 says she is to uphold the laws of God . No true allegiant will fail to aid her majesty in her duty. She is styled as defender of the faith. Your true allegiance is to aid her to provide that defense. You do not get to make up your own version of what true allegiance means.

Section 32 of the Canadian Charter of rights and freedoms the stated Supreme law in Canada says it only applies to the government and I am not a member of the corporate body of Canada. I am not to partake of mammons law! Matthew 6:24 Act 5:29

I am neither a constitutional partner nor a citizen of Canada nor am I a legal person. I was born a male child in this land and lived here all of my days but am not part of the corporate legal fiction and debt ridden corporation known as Canada. I am not a member nor debtor of that ungodly dead corporate body as I am flesh, a creation of God and his minister. I have not accepted nor have I created a SIN number and am not owned by nor entitled to by claim of any person.

I claim the Charter preamble and notable promise that God's law is Supreme. Deuteronomy 4:1-2; 12:32; Numbers 15:15

This is the preamble and the main focus and reason for the Constitution
"Whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognise the Supremacy of God and the rule of law."
It says in the preamble that God rules. That is all I need. I am not subject to the Charter
and it even says so .

The rest of the Canadian Charter and rights and freedoms applies only to those who are employed by the Government as section 32 clearly in simple English tells.
Application of Charter
32. (1) This Charter applies
(a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and
(b) to the legislatures and governments of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 5 shall not have effect until three years after this section comes into force.
Romans 16:17-20

I do hope that you will respect my faith and my God's law as you took an oath to uphold it.

It is a Christian God that is referred to in the Constitution preamble, Jehovah, Abraham's God and his rule of law that her majesty Queen Elizabeth defends. You as an private man or woman acting as an agent and public servant, by law took a solemn oath to be truly allegiant to her majesty. She is the head of the Church of England and sworn to uphold the laws of God with all of her power.

"I, ...................., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors. So help me God.
I am an emissary of Christ and a priest international in my ministry of God's word. Exodus 19:6 Ezra 7:23-24

I am not subject to the civil code of man (Acts 5:29; Romans 16:17-20 KJV) but am subject to the rightful claim of another man or woman if I commit sin against them and am, according to God's law, answerable for my sins against another man or woman or their property. I am not answerable to an assumption nor legal fiction( Staufen Vs Regina BCSC) nor do I allow any alteration of my name in any fashion anywhere at any time by any one man woman or corporation. It is a violation of my faith to allow my identity to be taken by bifurcation by another man woman or corporation for their benefit. No authority is offered nor implied to allow you nor any one to alter my name or respond to orders or warrants with alterations of my name intended to kidnap me or assume my property . Any such attempt to act upon such legal fiction orders, warrants or other documents of seizure or kidnapping without positive verification of the truly allegiant authority to execute and sign such orders, will be resisted lawfully and with force of Christian defense, until such verification of the truly allegiant authority's sanction to be issuing the instruments, is made known to myself as an officiating member of the clergy in defense of God's law and of the Church.

I am not a subject of any corporate legal fiction formation of my name as all is done in violation of my faith and duty to God. No one man or neither woman nor corporation has entitlement over me. Neither am I subject to imposters, who when asked in integrity, for proof of their sworn allegiant status, refuse to offer in proof of their authority the accurate meaning of their true allegiance to the Christian monarch of the commonwealth. You may ask Wayne Hatt Justice of the peace at the Edmonton Law Courts for an accurate definition of the meaning of that solemn oath of allegiance to her majesty Queen Elizabeth Defender of the faith.

It would be a sin to accept the status of a person and show respect to those classified as persons.

My Scriptures of the King James Bible, the Queens royal rule of law, in Deuteronomy
10:17; Acts 10:32 and James 2:9 make it very clear that if I should show respect to persons I am a sinner. (Persona is from the Latin for mask on a player on a stage. A legal fiction)

As a Christian minister of the word of Christ I must ensure whom I contract and communicate with, as I cannot slap hands with the wicked. I in my Christian faith and grasp of life know that if one assumes you put yourself at peril.

I can only deal with true allegiants to her majesty the Queen defender of the faith. The true allegiance to her majesty can only be seen and truly understood by examining the act that gives her majesty her sanction and power.

The Coronation act is an act of the British Parliament intent on defending the laws of the King James Bible, as it's primary purpose.

This is not speculation but the decrees of the people and the Chief Justice of the British Courts in:
The status of Christianity in England's Law was highlighted by Sir Edward Coke (1552-1634) Chief Justice of England when he said, "If the judgments of Parliament are not consistent with the Ten Commandments then they are invalid." He said English Common Law is the best birthright the subject has for safeguard and defense, not only of his goods, lands and revenues, but of his wife and children, his body, fame and life also. Ex-Prime Minister Menzies also said that no one could do better than live in a Common Law Country. Our Governors and Governors-General should have refused assent to many laws that were repugnant to God's law, and not in keeping with Common Law.
In 1879 Lord Chief Justice Kenyon (in the Williams case) stated that the Christian religion is part of the law of England. The Christian religion was therefore also the law in the Colonies of Great Britain. Mr. Justice Kelly also later confirmed in Australian Courts "Christianity is part and parcel of the law of this land."
The parliamentary opening prayer to Almighty God, "through the mediation of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ", which is said in our Canadian Parliament, likewise shows that Christianity is part and parcel of the law of this land. It shows rulers that they are to honor God 's Laws in the formulating of their laws, so that laws will be enacted "for His glory, for the good of Christ's Church etc." There is to be no violation of Christ's faith. But there is. No Royal Assent is to be given to any Bill that is inconsistent with Christianity. Rulers are not to deprive us of our rights to the blessings of Christian government in this nation. But they do! This is done in treason!
The Biblical scriptures etched into the four sides of the Parliament building are also prima fascia evidence of the Christian foundation of our government.
Examples of historical evidence, that for centuries Christianity has been the basis of British Justice and lawmaking, demonstrate conclusively the validity of our claim that Christianity is, and has always been, Canada's law worldview:-
1. It has been frequently ruled in Court cases in the commonwealth that Christianity is still "part and parcel of the Law of the land." (Kelly J is just one of the Judges.)
2. Christianity as the Law of the Land for England began in the ninth century with King Alfred the Great's adoption (about 880) of the "Ten Commandments" to be the basis of his Code of Laws for England. He made sure the Courts did their duty, judging according to the Ten Commandments, and history records that crime became a thing of the past. He introduced compulsory education, and the death penalty for murder, both of which are sourced in the Bible. The court Alfred kept was modeled on those he had observed as a youth accompanying his father on a tour of foreign capitals. His court was attended by all the country's nobles, bishops, and thanes. It was the first embryo parliament. Alfred established a chancery, an administration, and a civil service, which was a bureau of clerks. A circle of scholars both native and foreign gathered at Alfred's Court to establish a legal code. It was prefaced with the "Ten Commandments" and closed with the "Golden Rule". The good government Alfred gave England contributed to the success of his reign. A contemporary of Alfred said that "the aim of all his work was to promote the good of the people".
3. The Rt.Hon.Sir Alfred Denning wrote that for 700 years -
"The judges of England laid down the Common Law which precisely defined the rights of the individual and made the life and liberty of every law-abiding citizen secure from injury on the part of others, or of the State."
Canada has been a Common Law country since colonization.
Canadians Inherit Christian Liberties FOREVER through the U.K. Imperial Acts:
All the North American Colonies were founded under English Christian Law, and when the individual Canadian provinces passed their Imperial Acts Application Acts in the 1980s, Magna Carta, the Petition of Right, Habeas Corpus Act, the Bill of Rights and other inherited Imperial Acts were listed by commonwealth State Parliaments, as being established Christian law. They were confirmed as unalterable State law forever (and therefore also unalterable Canadian law forever). These constitute forever the official Law of the Land. They give us Christian liberties, peace, safety and security, and must be preserved for all subjects of the commonwealth yet to be born.
Long before the Imperial Acts Application Act re-entrenched the Bill of Rights, all citizens of Canada had right to common law of the Bible due to their being British subjects under the Crown. Common law takes in the Imperial Acts and enshrines the Bible as the foundation and sanction for those acts.
Along with the provided proof of the fact that the letters patent King James Bible is the rule of law in Canada, Judge Marshall of Leduc Alberta will confirm that holy and reverent fact as he did in court in Leduc Alberta June 18 2001A.D.
If you, the public servant receiving this Christian disclaimer, refuses to acknowledge to me, an officiating Christian minister of Christ, an accurate understanding of your true allegiance to her majesty and fail to deliver to me, an officiating Christian minister of Jesus Christ, with authority in defense of God's law, a true certified copy of your oath of allegiance to her majesty Queen Elizabeth II, I will assume by your failure and reluctance to show good faith and integrity that you are not a true allegiant to her majesty and are violating the law. I am left with no other conclusion unless you have lawful excuse you wish to communicate to me that wound retain the standing of God's law as Supreme.
Public servant refusing to deliver property
337. Every one who, being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty in right of Canada or a province, or in the service of a municipality, and entrusted by virtue of that employment with the receipt, custody, management or control of anything, refuses or fails to deliver it to a person who is authorized to demand it and does demand it is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years. R.S., c. C?34, s. 297.

I as a minister of Jesus Christ have a civil, moral, and religious duty to ask if those who are acting as her majesty's servants, understand the meaning of their oaths, as if they do not they are imposters attempting to overthrow her majesty's government in acts of treason, and I cannot accept them as her majesty's agents or as said allegiant's. Corinthians 8:16. If they refuse to answer me or direct that I be removed from the court for asking in duty according to law, then they are in commission of criminal acts of obstruction of a minister and Justice, violating an act of parliament, intimidation, impersonation of an officer of the court, Perjury, public nuisance, and possibly treason etc. I must request the property of their oaths in true certified form as I am of official status authorized by faith and ministry of Jesus Christ and defense of the King James Bible. Please, you the public servant receiving this notice, do not misinterpret my intent nor be dissuaded by superiors, my quest is only in defense of the integrally founded principles in God's law and my faith in that law as supreme.

Obstructing or violence to or arrest of officiating clergyman

176. (1) Every one who

(a) by threats or force, unlawfully obstructs or prevents or endeavors to
obstruct or prevent a clergyman or minister from celebrating divine service or
performing any other function in connection with his calling, or

(b) knowing that a clergyman or minister is about to perform, is on his way to
perform or is returning from the performance of any of the duties or functions
mentioned in paragraph (a)

(i) assaults or offers any violence to him, or

(ii) arrests him on a civil process, or under the pretence of executing a civil

is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not
exceeding two years.

Disturbing religious worship or certain meetings

(2) Every one who wilfully disturbs or interrupts an assemblage of persons met
for religious worship or for a moral, social or benevolent purpose is guilty of
an offence punishable on summary conviction.

(3) Every one who, at or near a meeting referred to in subsection (2), wilfully
does anything that disturbs the order or solemnity of the meeting is guilty of
an offence punishable on summary conviction.

R.S., c. C?34, s. 172.
Disobeying a statute
126. (1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament ( oath of allegiance Act)
By wilfully doing anything that it forbids or by willfully omitting to do
anything that it requires to be done ( Bear true allegiance) is, unless a punishment is expressly
provided by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for
a term not exceeding two years.

Attorney General of Canada may act
(2) Any proceedings in respect of a contravention of or conspiracy to contravene
an Act mentioned in subsection (1), other than this Act, may be instituted at
the instance of the Government of Canada and conducted by or on behalf of that

R.S., 1985, c. C?46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F).

Personating peace officer

130. Every one who
(a) falsely represents himself to be a peace officer or a public officer, or

(b) not being a peace officer or public officer, uses a badge or article of
uniform or equipment in a manner that is likely to cause persons to believe that
he is a peace officer or a public officer, as the case may be,

is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction. ( One cannot bear true allegiance unless they know what it is and do provide it unconditionally. If they fail they are impersonating .)
R.S., c. C?34, s. 119.

133. No person shall be convicted of an offence under section 132 on the
evidence of only one witness unless the evidence of that witness is corroborated
in a material particular by evidence that implicates the accused.
R.S., 1985, c. C?46, s. 133; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 17.

134. (1) Subject to subsection (2), every one who, not being specially
permitted, authorized or required by law to make a statement under oath or
solemn affirmation, makes such a statement, by affidavit, solemn declaration or
deposition or orally before a person who is authorized by law to permit it to be
made before him, knowing that the statement is false, is guilty of an offence
punishable on summary conviction.

If one says they will be truly allegiant to a Christian monarch and when asked does not know what the true allegiance is or will not provide it, it is evidence of the fact they lied when they took the oath.)

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a statement referred to in that subsection
that is made in the course of a criminal investigation.
R.S., 1985, c. C?46, s. 134; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 17.

I hope you will not think I have over done this I simply wish to show you historical proof and the law that applies to you as a public servant and allegiant of her majesty and of the Government of Canada and applicable provinces.
Section 92 of the British North American Act states clearly the province has no powers to make Criminal law nor break it with civil law. The Alberta Motor Vehicle act is civil application. I cannot register with a non-allegiant agency to her majesty, such as the minister of transportation, to ask permission to travel on the Queen's highways. (as it is a right of all Christian ministers to not be restricted in travel in delivering their ministry of Christ's Gospels.)
This definition from the criminal code of Canada proves my right.
"highway" means a road to which the public has the right of access, and includes
bridges over which or tunnels through which a road passes;

Her majesty, in her 1953 Coronation, said and promised to "uphold the laws of God with all of my power" and it is enshrined in the act itself of 1688 and the sections of the criminal code provided. All BAR members international are sworn allegiant to that same said Christian monarch. The Bible sits as testimony and rule of law to that defense in all courts in North America and the Commonwealth of Great Britain. The Westminster Confession of faith From 1646 an act of the British parliament establishes for all to see what a lawful oath means in section 22 of that enactment still in force.
Section 22
Of Lawful Oaths and Vows.
A lawful oath is a part of religious worship, wherein upon just occasion, the person swearing solemnly calleth God to witness what he asserteth or promiseth; and to judge him according to the truth or falsehood of what he sweareth.
II. The name of God only is that by which men ought to swear, and therein it is to be used with all holy fear and reverence; therefore to swear vainly or rashly by that glorious and dreadful name, or to swear at all by any other thing, is sinful, and to be abhorred. Yet, as, in matters of weight and moment, an oath is warranted by the Word of God, under the New Testament, as well as under the Old, so a lawful oath, being imposed by lawful authority, in such matters ought to be taken.
III. Whosoever taketh an oath ought duly to consider the weightiness of so solemn an act, and therein to avouch nothing but what he is fully persuaded is the truth. Neither may any man bind himself by oath to any thing but what is good and just, and what he believeth so to be, and what he is able and resolved to perform. Yet it is a sin to refuse an oath touching any thing that is good and just, being imposed by lawful authority.
IV. An oath is to be taken in the plain and common sense of the words, without equivocation or mental reservation. It can not oblige to sin; but in any thing not sinful, being taken, it binds to performance, although to a man's own hurt: nor is it to be violated, although made to heretics or infidels.
V. A vow is of the like nature with a promissory oath, and ought to be made with the like religious care, and to be performed with the like faithfulness.
VI. It is not to be made to any creature, but to God alone: and that it may be accepted, it is to be made voluntarily, out of faith and conscience of duty, in way of thankfulness for mercy received, or for obtaining of what we want; whereby we more strictly bind ourselves to necessary duties, or to other things, so far and so long as they may fitly conduce thereunto.
VII. No man may vow to do any thing forbidden in the Word of God, or what would hinder any duty therein commanded, or which is not in his own power, and for the performance of which he hath no promise or ability from God. In which respects, monastical vows of perpetual single life, professed poverty, and regular obedience, are so far from being degrees of higher perfection, that they are superstitious and sinful snares, in which no Christian may entangle himself.
Sincerely in my ministerial duty as an emissary of Christ I am expecting you to deliver to me, an officiating minister of Christ, a true certified copy of your oath of allegiance, , and definition of the meaning of that oath within fourteen days time. I demand this to verify to me that you are a true allegiant of her majesty so as to establish the integrity of the court or your truly allegiant sanction in God's law. Please do not lead me to believe you are an imposter by not providing it, as no "true allegiant" would refuse to do so. I cannot allow imposters to trespass on Church property nor exert false power over my ministry.

Minister of Christ performing a function of my calling

Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger
Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International
Worldwide Ecclesia, nearState of Awareness No code non-commercial