Message #54      Next      Previous
Ecclesiastical Notice to Kamsack RCMP Re: Taxes
  -  Ecclesiastica Notice January 6th 2006 A.D.

To: The private man Jeff Roscoe

Dear Jeff Roscoe, the private man acting as a True allegiant of her majesty, Public Servant or officer of the court,

This letter of Christian faith is to let you know as a man or a woman that I, Edward-Jay-Robin: of the family Belanger am of the baptized Christian faith , belief and ministry holding the King James Bible as the supreme rule of law and God's word as recognized as having standing in all of the de facto courts in Canada.

I as of my faith to the Christ cannot submit to the payment of taxes of any kind and wish you to be irrefutably aware that it is my Christian duty as God's minister officially performing a function of my calling as observed in 176, 180, and 423, of the criminal code that applies to you, and I am commanded by Jehovah God to not bow to de facto Gods who are imposing this unlawful tax. Exodus 20:3-5

I am being intimidated to violate my faith by John Meldrum lawyer for SaskTel and with the government ministers awareness. I am also being intimidated by the merchants of goods too violate my faith in God's word. Revenue Canada lawyers are responsible for this intimidation. Do you condone a violation of the criminal code by those it applies to? No law in the commonwealth exists allowing anyone to intimidate me to violate my faith in Christ and her majesty's defense of God's law.

No law` exists allowing antone to dictate to me how to read and rightly dicern God's word or practice the functions of my calling to Christs ministry and I will stand undaunted even if you commit treason and arrest me for practicing my faith.

I have private agreements with John Meldrum and Robert Watson who acts as the legal counsel and President of Sasktel who have instructed employee's to intimidate our ministers to pay the tax or be cut off and the same is with every lawyer for whatever department, as they are advising intimidation. A lawyer can break the law but if he had been doing for to folk for so long that he seems to think it is OK he becomes a threat to men and women of declared Christian faith. They are threatening the practice of my Christian faith that has more clout than a turban need we go there.

Will the fraudulent antagonistic and deceitful effort of Rodger Piper NSI agent interfere with your acceptance of my truths??

He has a private emotional vendetta against me as his appointment to investigate me for letters of faith I sent to Jean Chretien and he could find nothing unlawful in what I was doing. Informing the Mp's of the fraud!

Will you to attempt to violate my Christian faith by intimidating me to bow in charging me with theft of a civil tax?? Is a tax property?

It cannot be property until it is collected voluntarily. Taking it after it has been collected is theft!

Tell Revenue Canada whose named private men acting as de facto officials are in a conflict of interest, that commercial civil de facto law and it's enforcement are not part of your duty!

I simply put cannot lawfully be forced to pay that tax and will not as of my faith9i!!

I intend no discrimination of your own faith by this letter but would ensure my own defense against assumption of theft or discrimination intimidation and extortion by such truthful and open communication regarding my Christian faith and beliefs.

I am, in following my faith and as a Christian minister, not subject to men's laws but am obedient unto all men in God's law. Romans 16:17-20; Corinthians 8:15-19;11:1-2.

I as a minister have come to be aware of corruption within the governing bodies of this land. Because of this knowledge I must ensure I do not deal with them as they are imposters. I must be sure of their true status. I intend no disrespect by this letter of demand only clarity and integrity.

It is agreed with no rebuttal that the British parliamentary law of the Queens Coronation Act of 1688 says she is to uphold the laws of God and that Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor did swear to God in 1953 that she would do so .I is irrefutable and true that no true allegiant will fail to aid her majesty in her styled duty. She is styled as "defender of the faith" The Christian Faith!. Your true allegiance written in law that is still in force is to aid her to provide that defense and is an act of religious worship. You do not get to make up your own version of what true allegiance means. Chapter 22 of the Westminster Confession of faith makes it clear what a lawful oath requires.

Section 32 of the Canadian Charter of rights and freedoms the stated Supreme law in Canada says it only applies to the government and I am not a member of the corporate body of Canada. I am God's minister and I am not to partake of mammons law! Exodus 20:3-5; Matthew 6:24; Acts 5:29

I am neither a constitutional partner nor a citizen of Canada nor am I a legal person. I was born a male child in this land and lived here all of my days but am not part of the corporate legal fiction and debt ridden corporation known as Canada. I am not a member nor debtor of that ungodly dead corporate body as I am flesh, a creation of God and his minister. I have not accepted nor have I created a SIN number and am not owned by nor entitled to by claim of any person.

I claim the Charter preamble and notable promise that God's law is Supreme. Deuteronomy 4:1-2; 12:32; Numbers 15:15

This is the preamble and the main focus and reason for the Constitution
"Whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognise the Supremacy of God and the rule of law."
It says in the preamble that God rules. That is all I need. I am not subject to the Charter
and it even says so .

The rest of the Canadian Charter and rights and freedoms applies only to those who are employed by the Government as section 32 clearly in simple English tells.
Application of Charter
32. (1) This Charter applies
(a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and ( note the provinces are not included)
(b) to the legislatures and governments of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province. ( Note it does not apply to the men and women only legislatures which are not living flesh))
You may wish to refer to the Government of Canada Heritage website as they admit there that the charter does not apply to individuals businesses and organizations and that the charter only applies to government.

Here is Michel Jeans Admission she is de facto

Here is the World banks Admission as to what De facto means

Here are several law dictionaries explaining what de facto means in law. a collegiate dictionarie will only give you a basic non detailed version like in fact or in reality. Rape is a de facto act, it happened in fact and in reality but it is not lawful! Dejure coitus is within the confines of consenting adults married in God's law.

That means the supreme law of Canada as the head corporation and founding fiction has made subordinate laws that only apply to itself and all of it's created legal fictions. The laws of a dead in law fictional debtor corporation do not apply to me the minister of God unless they conform with God's law.
Deuteronomy 4:2;12:32 ; Acts 5:29; Romans 16:17-20

I do hope that you will respect my faith and my God's law as you took an oath to God to be truly allegiant to the Christian Defender of the Faith and I expect you to uphold it.

It is a Christian God that is referred to in the Constitution preamble, Jehovah, Abraham's God and his rule of law that her majesty Queen Elizabeth defends. You as an private man or woman acting as an agent and public servant, by law took a solemn oath to be truly allegiant to her majesty. She is the head of the Church of England and sworn to uphold the laws of God with all of her power.

This is the oath you swore to God before becoming a member of the corporation of Canada

"I, ...................., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors. So help me God.
I am an emissary of Christ and a priest international in my ministry of God's word and as such am in official performance of the functions of my calling in Christ's service to ensure I make all aware of my ministry and that I cannot submit to the civil code of man such as taxes unless it adheres to God's law. Exodus 19:6 Ezra 7:23-24

Our Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International ministers have private registered mail agreements with the private men being Irwin Cotler, Guiliano Zaccardelli, John McCallum, Michel Dorais and Charles MacNab being the head counselor for Revenue Canada in these matters and many other private men and women regarding our Christian Faith. We as a Church and as God's ministers have even placed leins against them privately in the British Columbia PPSA registry under protest of threat duress and intimidation and had the federal department of Justice respond to that private matter with fraudulent expenditure of tax payers public dollars dealing with the private matters between our Church ministers and the unlawful actions of those named private men.
I as God's minister am informing you the private man of a fraud inside of the justice and revenue departments of the liberals.

As we have seen they are not above investigation how about this one??

( Supreme court of Canada Roncarelli v.Duplessis 1959) Ezekiel 33:6.

as the Church ministers have received communications from such as Everett Summerfield Commissioner of the NWT regarding a private communication and agreement of good faith from Minister Methody Lozinski of Hyas to Guiliano Zaccardelli in his private capacity. It was returned to the private man to make him aware of the fraud!!

Spending tax dollars on private matters is a breach of trust and intimidation to violate our faith is as well obstruction of our ministers ability to officially perform the functions of their ecclesiastic calling and causing us great discomfort is failing to provide that true allegiance in honor and style as according to law and duty and as such is a major nuisance to the spreading of the word of Christ and his offer. We are not to be taxed in our ministry and revenue Canada cannot lawfully tell you to violate those sections of the criminal code `without admitting we are slaves and like cattle will be forced by the owners of the cattle to bow to the false god government.
You have seen the definition of de facto from the creditor and the law dictionaries. You have seen the head officer of the de facto debtor, in receivership, corporation admit she is de facto meaning unlawful!

Section 2 from the famed BNA act was repealed by Queen Victoria in 1894 deleting the succession of the enforcement of the law upon her ancestors, meaning each new monarch would have to re assent to the law. This was never done. Loop hole yes but I wish you to be aware of the full extent of theunlawful fraud that has been foisted upon unsuspecting women and men in this great land called Canada by corrupted power mad lawyers and bankers.

After the Statute of Westminster of 1931 separating and annulling the law making authority of the British Crown from Canada and the commonwealth and the bankrupsty of the corporation known as Canada took place there was no law available for the debtor corporation Canada to appoint a new Governor General so Mackenzie King being Canada's Prime Minister unlawfully and fraudulently signed for the King in 1947 when the new Governor General was appointed.
No Income tax act exists according to the Clerk of the senate and Parliament and the Parliamentary Library according to the publications of statutes act.
That means that no lawful act having the Queen impose income tax upon non commercial men and women exits but an act still in force in the Canadian Revised statutes as formed and non repealable states thast no tax whatsoever shall be assessed in any of the colonies

.I am not subject to the civil code of man! Collossians 2:12-20 This act below is from 1778 and the reign of King George the Third and is still on the books as in force law in Canada. Note how it says no tax whatever shall be imposed except for commerce!

It is agreed with no rebuttal to the fact that we as men and women of the Christian faith and confession are not commercial entities!

XLIII. ''And whereas by an Act passed in the Eighteenth Year of the Reign (1778) of His late Majesty King George the Third, intituled An Act for removing all Doubts and Apprehensions concerning Taxation by the Parliament of Great Britain in any of the Colonies, Provinces, and Plantations in North America and the West Indies; and for repealing so much of an Act made in the Seventh Year of the Reign of His present Majesty as imposes a Duty on Tea imported from Great Britain into any Colony or Plantation in America, or relating thereto, it was declared, that "the King and Parliament of Great Britain would not impose any Duty, Tax, or Assessment whatever, payable in any of His Majesty's Colonies, Provinces, and Plantations in North America or the West Indies, except only such Duties as it might be expedient to impose for the Regulation of Commerce, the net Produce of such Duties to be always paid and applied to and for the Use of the Colony, Province, or Plantation in which the same shall be respectively levied, ( Ezra 7:23-26; Acts 5:29; Romans 16:17-20 KJV)

I am God's minister but am subject to the rightful claim of another man or woman if I commit sin against them and am, according to God's law, answerable for my sins against another man or woman or their property. I am not answerable to an assumption nor legal fiction( Staufen Vs Regina BCSC 2001)like reversal all caps names as it is done for a financial purpose, nor do I allow any alteration of my name in any fashion anywhere at any time by any one man woman or corporation.

Please be aware that it is a serious violation of my faith to be forced to submit to the illegitimate laws of a admitted false god government. It is also an extreme violation of my Christian faith to allow my identity to be taken by bifurcation by another man woman or corporation for their financial benefit as in a bill of exchange like a traffic ticket. No authority is offered nor implied to allow you nor any one to alter my name or respond to complaint about my ministry not submitting to the tax of a false god, bill of exchange de facto orders or warrants with alterations of my name intended to kidnap me or assume my property . Any such de facto meaning unlawful attempt to act upon such legal fiction orders, warrants or other documents of seizure or kidnapping without positive verification of the truly allegiant authority to execute and sign such orders, will be resisted lawfully and with force of Christian defense, until such verification of the truly allegiant authority's sanction to be issuing the instruments, is made known to myself as an officiating member of the clergy in defense of God's law and of the Church.

You agree in honor to provide our ministry with the name of the private bonding Agent for your liability bond when requested in honor to save harmless our ministry from private damages caused by the unlawful actions causing harm and damage to our ministry on the part of those who fail to respect our faith and provide true allegiance to the Christian Monarch as required.

I am not a subject of any corporate legal fiction formation of my name as all is done in violation of my faith and duty to God. No one man or neither woman nor corporation has entitlement over me. Neither am I subject to imposters, who when asked in integrity, for proof of their sworn allegiant status, refuse to offer in proof of their authority being the knowledge of the accurate meaning of their true allegiance to the Christian monarch of the commonwealth and their duty to enforce it. You may ask Wayne Hatt Justice of the peace at the Edmonton Law Courts for an accurate definition of the meaning of that solemn oath of allegiance to her majesty Queen Elizabeth Defender of the faith.

When asked he replied immediately " To uphold the laws of the King James Bible"

It would be a sin to accept the status of a person and show respect to those classified as persons.

My Scriptures of the King James Bible, the Queens royal rule of law, in Deuteronomy
10:17; Acts 10:32 Romans 2:11 and James 2:9 make it very clear that if I should show respect to persons I am a sinner. (Persona is from the Latin for mask on a player on a stage. A legal fiction)

As a Christian minister of the word of Christ I must ensure whom I contract and communicate with, as I cannot slap hands with the wicked. I in my Christian faith and grasp of life know that if one assumes you put yourself at peril.

I can only deal with true allegiants to her majesty the Queen defender of the faith. The true allegiance to her majesty can only be seen and truly understood by examining the act that gives her majesty her sanction and power.

The Coronation act is an act of the British Parliament intent on defending the laws of the King James Bible, as it's primary purpose.

This is not speculation but the decrees of the people and the Chief Justice of the British Courts in:
The status of Christianity in England's Law was highlighted by Sir Edward Coke (1552-1634) Chief Justice of England when he said, "If the judgments of Parliament are not consistent with the Ten Commandments then they are invalid." He said English Common Law is the best birthright the subject has for safeguard and defense, not only of his goods, lands and revenues, but of his wife and children, his body, fame and life also. Ex-Prime Minister Menzies also said that no one could do better than live in a Common Law Country. Our Governors and Governors-General should have refused assent to many laws that were repugnant to God's law, and not in keeping with Common Law.
In 1879 Lord Chief Justice Kenyon (in the Williams case) stated that the Christian religion is part of the law of England. The Christian religion was therefore also the law in the Colonies of Great Britain. Mr. Justice Kelly also later confirmed in Australian Courts "Christianity is part and parcel of the law of this land."
The parliamentary opening prayer to Almighty God, "through the mediation of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ", which is said in our Canadian Parliament, likewise shows that Christianity is part and parcel of the law of this land. It shows rulers that they are to honor God 's Laws in the formulating of their laws, so that laws will be enacted "for His glory, for the good of Christ's Church etc." There is to be no violation of Christ's faith. But there is. No Royal Assent is to be given to any Bill that is inconsistent with Christianity. Rulers are not to deprive us of our rights to the blessings of Christian government in this nation. But they do! This is done in treason!
The Biblical scriptures etched into the four sides of the Parliament building are also prima fascia evidence of the Christian foundation of our government.
Examples of historical evidence, that for centuries Christianity has been the basis of British Justice and lawmaking, demonstrate conclusively the validity of our claim that Christianity is, and has always been, Canada's law worldview:-
1. It has been frequently ruled in Court cases in the commonwealth that Christianity is still "part and parcel of the Law of the land." (Kelly J is just one of the Judges.)
2. Christianity as the Law of the Land for England began in the ninth century with King Alfred the Great's adoption (about 880) of the "Ten Commandments" to be the basis of his Code of Laws for England. He made sure the Courts did their duty, judging according to the Ten Commandments, and history records that crime became a thing of the past. He introduced compulsory education, and the death penalty for murder, both of which are sourced in the Bible. The court Alfred kept was modeled on those he had observed as a youth accompanying his father on a tour of foreign capitals. His court was attended by all the country's nobles, bishops, and thanes. It was the first embryo parliament. Alfred established a chancery, an administration, and a civil service, which was a bureau of clerks. A circle of scholars both native and foreign gathered at Alfred's Court to establish a legal code. It was prefaced with the "Ten Commandments" and closed with the "Golden Rule". The good government Alfred gave England contributed to the success of his reign. A contemporary of Alfred said that "the aim of all his work was to promote the good of the people".
3. The Rt.Hon.Sir Alfred Denning wrote that for 700 years -
"The judges of England laid down the Common Law which precisely defined the rights of the individual and made the life and liberty of every law-abiding citizen secure from injury on the part of others, or of the State."
Canada has been a Common Law country since colonization.
Canadians Inherit Christian Liberties FOREVER through the U.K. Imperial Acts:
All the North American Colonies were founded under English Christian Law, and when the individual Canadian provinces passed their Imperial Acts Application Acts in the 1980s, Magna Carta, the Petition of Right, Habeas Corpus Act, the Bill of Rights and other inherited Imperial Acts were listed by commonwealth State Parliaments, as being established Christian law. They were confirmed as unalterable State law forever (and therefore also unalterable Canadian law forever). These constitute forever the official Law of the Land. They give us Christian liberties, peace, safety and security, and must be preserved for all subjects of the commonwealth yet to be born.
Long before the Imperial Acts Application Act re-entrenched the Bill of Rights, all citizens of Canada had right to common law of the Bible due to their being British subjects under the Crown. Common law takes in the Imperial Acts and enshrines the Bible as the foundation and sanction for those acts.
Along with the provided proof of the fact that the letters patent King James Bible is the rule of law in Canada, Judge Marshall of Leduc Alberta will confirm that holy and reverent fact as he did in court in Leduc Alberta June 18 2001A.D.
If you, the public servant receiving this Christian disclaimer, refuses to acknowledge to me, an officiating Christian minister of Christ, an accurate understanding of your true allegiance to her majesty and fail to deliver to me, an officiating Christian minister of Jesus Christ, with authority in defense of God's law, a true certified copy of your oath of allegiance to her majesty Queen Elizabeth II, I will assume by your failure and reluctance to show good faith and integrity that you are not a true allegiant to her majesty and are violating the law. I am left with no other conclusion unless you have lawful excuse you wish to communicate to me that wound retain the standing of God's law as Supreme.
Public servant refusing to deliver property
337. Every one who, being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty in right of Canada or a province, or in the service of a municipality, and entrusted by virtue of that employment with the receipt, custody, management or control of anything, refuses or fails to deliver it to a person who is authorized to demand it and does demand it is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years. R.S., c. C?34, s. 297.

I as a minister of Jesus Christ am authorized by his command and have a civil, moral, and religious duty to ask if those who are acting as her majesty's servants, understand the meaning of their oaths, as if they do not they are imposters attempting to overthrow her majesty's government in acts of treason, and I cannot accept them as her majesty's agents or as said allegiant's. Corinthians 8:16. If they refuse to answer me or direct that I be removed from the court for asking in duty according to law, then they are in commission of criminal acts of obstruction of a minister and Justice, violating an act of parliament, intimidation, impersonation of an officer of the court, Perjury, public nuisance, and possibly treason etc. I must request the property of their oaths in true certified form as I am of official status authorized by faith and ministry of Jesus Christ and defense of the King James Bible. Please, you the public servant receiving this notice, do not misinterpret my intent nor be dissuaded by superiors, my quest is only in defense of the integrally founded principles in God's law and my faith in that law as supreme.

Obstructing or violence to or arrest of officiating clergyman

176. (1) Every one who

(a) by threats or force, unlawfully obstructs or prevents or endeavors to
obstruct or prevent a clergyman or minister from celebrating divine service or
performing any other function in connection with his calling, or

(b) knowing that a clergyman or minister is about to perform, is on his way to
perform or is returning from the performance of any of the duties or functions
mentioned in paragraph (a)

(i) assaults or offers any violence to him, or

(ii) arrests him on a civil process, or under the pretence of executing a civil process, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.

Disturbing religious worship or certain meetings

(2) Every one who wilfully disturbs or interrupts an assemblage of persons met for religious worship or for a moral, social or benevolent purpose is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

(3) Every one who, at or near a meeting referred to in subsection (2), willfully does anything that disturbs the order or solemnity of the meeting is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

R.S., c. C?34, s. 172.
Disobeying a statute
126. (1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament ( oath of allegiance Act)
By wilfully doing anything that it forbids or by willfully omitting to do
anything that it requires to be done ( Bear true allegiance) is, unless a punishment is expressly
provided by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for
a term not exceeding two years.

Attorney General of Canada may act
(2) Any proceedings in respect of a contravention of or conspiracy to contravene
an Act mentioned in subsection (1), other than this Act, may be instituted at
the instance of the Government of Canada and conducted by or on behalf of that

R.S., 1985, c. C?46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F).

Personating peace officer

130. Every one who
(a) falsely represents himself to be a peace officer or a public officer, or

(b) not being a peace officer or public officer, uses a badge or article of
uniform or equipment in a manner that is likely to cause persons to believe that
he is a peace officer or a public officer, as the case may be,

is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction. ( One cannot bear true allegiance unless they know what it is and do provide it unconditionally. If they fail they are impersonating .)
R.S., c. C?34, s. 119.

134. (1) Subject to subsection (2), every one who, not being specially
permitted, authorized or required by law to make a statement under oath or
solemn affirmation, makes such a statement, by affidavit, solemn declaration or
deposition or orally before a person who is authorized by law to permit it to be
made before him, knowing that the statement is false, is guilty of an offence
punishable on summary conviction.

If one says they will be truly allegiant to a Christian monarch and when asked does not know what the true allegiance is or will not provide it, it is evidence of the fact they lied when they took the oath.)

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a statement referred to in that subsection
that is made in the course of a criminal investigation.
R.S., 1985, c. C?46, s. 134; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 17.

I hope you will not think I have over done this I simply wish to show you historical proof and the law that applies to you as a public servant and allegiant of her majesty and of the Government of Canada and applicable provinces.
Section 92 of the British North American Act states clearly the province has no powers to make Criminal law nor break it with civil law. The Saskatchewan Motor Vehicle act is civil application. I cannot register with a non-allegiant agency to her majesty, such as the minister of transportation, to ask permission to travel on the Queen's highways. (as it is a right of all Christian ministers to not be restricted in travel in delivering their ministry of Christ's Gospels.)
This definition from the criminal code of Canada proves my right.
highway" means a road to which the public has the right of access, and includes
bridges over which or tunnels through which a road passes;

Her majesty, in her 1953 Coronation,according to the law of parliament from 1688 the Coronation Act said and promised to "uphold the laws of God with all of my power" and it is enshrined in the act itself of 1688 and the sections of the criminal code provided.

All BAR members international are sworn allegiant to that same said Christian monarch. The Bible sits as testimony and rule of law to that defense in all courts in North America and the Commonwealth of Great Britain. The Westminster Confession of faith From 1646 an act of the British parliament establishes for all to see what a lawful oath means in section 22 of that enactment still in force.
Section 22
Of Lawful Oaths and Vows.
A lawful oath is a part of religious worship, wherein upon just occasion, the person swearing solemnly calleth God to witness what he asserteth or promiseth; and to judge him according to the truth or falsehood of what he sweareth.
II. The name of God only is that by which men ought to swear, and therein it is to be used with all holy fear and reverence; therefore to swear vainly or rashly by that glorious and dreadful name, or to swear at all by any other thing, is sinful, and to be abhorred. Yet, as, in matters of weight and moment, an oath is warranted by the Word of God, under the New Testament, as well as under the Old, so a lawful oath, being imposed by lawful authority, in such matters ought to be taken.
III. Whosoever taketh an oath ought duly to consider the weightiness of so solemn an act, and therein to avouch nothing but what he is fully persuaded is the truth. Neither may any man bind himself by oath to any thing but what is good and just, and what he believeth so to be, and what he is able and resolved to perform. Yet it is a sin to refuse an oath touching any thing that is good and just, being imposed by lawful authority.
IV. An oath is to be taken in the plain and common sense of the words, without equivocation or mental reservation. It can not oblige to sin; but in any thing not sinful, being taken, it binds to performance, although to a man's own hurt: nor is it to be violated, although made to heretics or infidels.
V. A vow is of the like nature with a promissory oath, and ought to be made with the like religious care, and to be performed with the like faithfulness.
VI. It is not to be made to any creature, but to God alone: and that it may be accepted, it is to be made voluntarily, out of faith and conscience of duty, in way of thankfulness for mercy received, or for obtaining of what we want; whereby we more strictly bind ourselves to necessary duties, or to other things, so far and so long as they may fitly conduce thereunto.
VII. No man may vow to do any thing forbidden in the Word of God, or what would hinder any duty therein commanded, or which is not in his own power, and for the performance of which he hath no promise or ability from God. In which respects, monastical vows of perpetual single life, professed poverty, and regular obedience, are so far from being degrees of higher perfection, that they are superstitious and sinful snares, in which no Christian may entangle himself.
Sincerely in my ministerial duty as an emissary of Christ I am expecting you to deliver to me, an officiating minister of Christ, a true certified copy of your oath of allegiance, , and definition of the meaning of that oath within fourteen days time. I demand this to verify to me that you are a true allegiant of her majesty so as to establish the integrity of the court or your truly allegiant sanction in God's law. Please do not lead me to believe you are an imposter by not providing it, as no "true allegiant" would refuse to do so. I cannot allow imposters to trespass on Church property nor exert false power over my ministry.

Minister of Christ performing a function of my calling

Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger
Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International
General Delivery
Kamsack Ecclesia, near Kamsack Saskatchewan
No code non-commercial ( see section 11 Regulations Canada Postal Corporation Act) 1-306-542-8181