Message #87 Next Previous
Letter to Jean Chretien which got me a threat by NSI RCMP
- Sent March 20th 2001 A.D.
To The Honourable Jean Chretien
Prime Minister of Canada
From Minister of God: Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger (Copy write, no changes or alterations permitted)
Church of Ecumenical Redemption International Heatherdown ecclesia
C/o general delivery
near Onoway, Alberta no code
I would like amend my previous letter of the 16th of this month with this one to make you aware of the crime of treason being committed by various federal judges I have stood before, in defence of the faith and the Christians I represent. I'm a Minister of God bonafide, and his law as contained in the Royal King James Bible decreed by Royal Letters patent and By Royal decree is in every courtroom in the land as defence of the faith.
The preamble to the Canadian Constitution as consented to as advised by the Lords spiritual, is testament to the supremacy of God and his rule of law, for no other law can be superior to God's law , as God is supreme.
The oath of allegiance to her majesty stems from hundreds of years ago when in defence of the faith the Christian monarchs of early England were consecrated as those Christian monarchs, in the coronation ceremonial signed oath, promising to uphold God's law as intent on protecting the integrity and honour of God's court. As did her majesty the Queen Elizabeth the second in 1953 in the royal coronation oath of acclaim before the whole world.
All agents of the crown, magistrates, justices, Judges, commissioners, masters, police politicians, public servants, and agents of the crown of any sort that are sworn allegiant or doing work for her majesty the Queen, defender the faith, head of the church of England, the Christian monarch of the Commonwealth, must in acknowledgement of an oath to the defender of the faith being Christian , and in acknowledgement of the preamble to the Canadian Constitution, recognize the supremacy of God, if asked by a concerned and affected party with authority such as myself. If that oath allegiant to a Christian Monarch ,fails to acknowledge the supremacy of God when asked by anybody with authority to do so they violate their oath of allegiance and section 337CCC and have no jurisdiction in any of the Queens business. They revert themselves to a private party and if they attempt to proceed against you in her majesty's name, they commit treason. Treason by attempting to overthrow the Queens Government under Gods rule with mans rule under the authority of a Judge.
The judicial oath of the Judges is stored in the office of Denis Guay acting commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs. The clerk that holds the files is Junette Bopla. Judith Bellis is the director of Judicial Affairs, she has told her assistant Karen Cutty to inform me that the judges have no written oaths of allegiance and that they only swear to her majesty verbally. This was after I received information from Junette Bopala that the oaths with the signatures were held in her records. Elizabeth Sanderson is connected with Justice and so is Joy Kane I believe, Georgette Sheridan, and Ann Mclellan herself may to also be connected to an all out to attempt, vacant of any bonafide"law",to prevent me from gaining access to certified copies of the signed oaths of allegiance to her majesty Queen defender the faith the Christian monarch of Canada by the Judges listed below. They are inclined to hang up when they here me calling even your office staff will do the same when I ask them those two questions of integrity testing nature as have the staff at Rideau house and the RCMP that work there.
When I as a Minister of God, ask Judges, Justices, Masters, Crown prosecutors members of the RCMP, Federal MP's police CSIS or any other Crown agent that is sworn allegiant to her majesty the Queen if they recognize the supremacy of God such as the infamous Revenue Canada crew, if they fail to answer in the affirmative they are not agents of the Queen they are imposters.
I hope the vision I witnessed in the church during Pierre Elliott Trudeau's funeral was that of one that Sincerely has faith in God and does so recognize his supremacy. This will make my job a lot easier as I fear the dark forces spoken on at Ephesians 6: 10-16 have taken hold of our justice system and behind the very doors of the Governor General's office. I have on my armour (Ephesians 6:10-20)and will repel the darts that these dark skirted Lords have attempted to throw at me in preventing me access to those oaths and the justice Ministers office even telling the Governor Generals aid Joanne Menier that even she could not see them, this the Queens reps assistant! The oath is to the Queen not the Judges! The Queen and anyone else in defence of the faith has the right to ask and be replied to in respect in the affirmative,
I have made deliberate attempts to communicate my intent to the Minister of justice the Solicitor General's office the Governor General's office to (governor's office of Alberta the justice ministers office of Alberta the chief justice of the provincial Court of Alberta Edward Walter the RCMP K. division a Mr. Chill, an inspector I believe who was not it all interested in my claims of treason and my proof via the documents of the Canadian Constitution the statutes of Westminster and coronation oath of 1953. I was not able to convince the RCMP officer telling me he was inspector Schill to at least investigate. I have also attempted to communicate with Jag the military component of the public judiciary. The people I have spoken to at these departments t do not understand their oath of allegiance to the Christian monarch as the Lt. at the Namao JAG office.He told me he only swore allegiance to that part of her majesty that was head of the state of Canada. I asked him "where is your bloody Sword that you just severed her majesty with and who gave you the authority to decide which part of her majesty you consider appropriate to swear an oath of allegiance to?" He was needless to say left speech less and declined any further comment after I asked him if he recognised the supremacy of God. to this date after many requests to Department of Defence to investigate my claims they have expressed little or no interest in pursuing the crime of treason.
If it is the judiciary that are committing treason we can hardly expect judiciary to find them guilty unless the Queen is lying on the floor in a pool blood and the Judge has a smoking gun in his hand. Since a portion of the judiciary have via the Kol Nidre or the masonic oath ascribed to in the masonic handbook, secretly declined their oaths and have no faith in God as supreme. I must include, in faith of God and in common sense as a man created by God that these Judges have a hidden agenda, a private law that we're not informed of nor ruled by.
The rule of law in Canada it is as the Queen has proclaimed, God's law is permanent, as I would turn you to Deuteronomy in the Queens Royal Law the Kings James Bible 4: 1-2: 12:32 and numerous other scriptures wherein God's law is commanded by God to neither add to nor take away. This intent is further supported by Paul in Romans 16: 17-20, wherein he advises to beware of those that would divide you from the doctrine. Romans 13 states that he is Gods minister several times, any minister of God will proudly proclaim their recognition of that supremacy to anyone that asks. They the judges I am complaining about will not reply when asked indicating extreme arrogance and that they do not feel allegiant to the Queen. This said indicates they have no jurisdiction in any matters before the court as they are not the court formed under her majesty in defence of the faith to be supervised by allegiants that are equipped to know the law! No allegiance, no recognition of God as Supreme = no Canadian Judge!!!
The Queen having sworn to uphold God's law and having accepted the royal law from the Archbishop of Canterbury as the greatest gift in the world, empowers her allegiant's with the royal law the lively oracle of God as supreme. Any of those so-called allegiant men or women that fail to recognize the duty of their oath to a Christian Monarch and open recognition of the preamble (inclusive of God's supremacy ) to the supreme law of Canada must either resign their position or continue in Dishonour and commit treason.
You may say this is a violation of the charter rights and freedoms as religious discrimination, but that charter does not apply to me, but only to you and all the rest of the government Federal and provincial(section32). I have no contract to a relationship that is bona fide with the government of Canada I am not a member of the body corporate or the body politic neither am I an entity or described as a statutory person enslaved to any fiat debt equity structure perpetrated by Canadian customs and revenue or the IMF or the world bank.
I am a Minister of the Most High with Jesus Christ as my saviour as he appears is yours. Our common bond is the same that the Queen defends. I hope this truth and faith in God will get by the red tape and cause you to inquire into this blasphemic attempt at treason and as to just exactly what the Hell is going on!
I even Had the RCMP at Rideau Hall threaten to cut off my phone under 372 of the CC because of my insistence on reporting the crime of treason now that is a conspiracy of a weird nature!
The operators there were instructed to hang up on me as soon as I spoke. They did today leave my line open for over half an hour preventing me from using my own phone without a court order to do so. I hope they taped those calls I wish you to hear what I asked them as a Minister of God. And because of my defence of the faith I have been hung up on or refused to return my calls by all of the aforementioned parties now inclusive of Mr. Guay who was amazed at what I told him and shocked to hear my request. He among the group seemed most sincere aside from Ms. Meneir the GG's assistant who was told by Justice that even she as the GG's assistant who wanted to see a Judges oath would to be refused and that the FOIP would not apply in this circumstance!!! I commend Mr Guay for his efforts to not get caught in the cross fire he is an integral man and you should be proud to have him in your judicial staff and as a loyal agent of the crown her majesty the Queen. The worst case of arrogantitis I have ever seen was Master Quinn,of the Alberta court of Queens Bench, he, after being asked the Questions of allegiance and primadeo recognition by a Christian minister in defence of a fellow Christian, told he had no jurisdiction without the courts affirmation of the questions and told that if he proceeded he would be committing treason, then tilted his head sideways and said "what do I care of the Queen I'm Irish, I have a tough neck" This alone if not treason on the record is contempt of court!!!!
Please investigate as the superior public servant in as expedient fashion as treason permits. I will await what a reasonable man would conclude would be enough time to get a oath allegiant response to such a factual allegation of this magnitude from an office of your influence. Please adhere to the tenants of 337 of the criminal code as I as a minister of God and a freeman sovereign under God and in her majesty's Queen Elizabeth's name, in defence of the faith, do so hereby make this request of you to tell me what law exists and to provide me with that law that is bonafide in Canada as proclaimed by the Queen, that has the power to prevent me or any other concerned party of faith from gaining access to and receiving a certified copy of these oaths of allegiance to the Queen sworn to by the pending judges of this country's court system.
I anxiously await your reply
Minister of God Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger
March 17th 2001 A.D.
To: Denis Guay: Acting commissioner for the Commission of Federal Judicial Affairs
From: Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger (Copy write, no changes or alterations permitted)
C/o general delivery
near Onoway, Alberta
This is a repeat formal request for the signed oaths of allegiance to her majesty the Queen Elizabeth II of England of the following Federal Judges, justices masters and adjudicating members, that did subscribe to her majesty's oath upon taking the office of Judge Justice etc.
Justice Costigan of the Alberta Court of Appeals
Master Quinn of the Alberta Court of Queens Bench
Justice Belzil of the Alberta Court of Queens Bench
Member Loreen Clark Adjudicator Adjudication appeal division immigration Canada
Member Paul Kyba Adjudicator Adjudication Appeal division immigration Canada
Daphne Shaw Dyck Adjudication appeal division immigration Canada
Anita Bascariol Adjudicator Adjudication appeal division immigration Canada
Sylvia Albi-Rapaj QC Immigration
Gary Reimer QC Immigration
A Mr. McQuage QC Justice Canada Alberta
Elinor Caplan MP Minister of Immigration
If you choose denial of access, I demand the reasons, in legislation format, in line with 337 of the CCC that you may deny me access to these proudly proclaimed documents of integrity..
Without free public access to these documents it challenges and brings justice to disrepute. The Judges will not want to let anyone to see them as some of them are committing treason in her majesty's name and wish to be immune to any reproach.
As a Minister of God and in defence of the faith I demand in her majesty Queen Elizabeth's name that certified copy's of the oaths of the allegiants of the crown listed above so hereby requested in good faith and expectation be released to me immediately in the administration of justice and the sanctity of our judicial system.
The criminal code has provision that these documents must be released not withstanding superceding legislation and allows for a prison penalty if not complied with.
Public servant refusing to deliver property
337. Every one who, being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty
in right of Canada or a province, or in the service of a municipality, and
entrusted by virtue of that employment with the receipt, custody, management or
control of anything, refuses or fails to deliver it to a person who is
authorized to demand it and does demand it is guilty of an indictable offence
and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
R.S., c. C 34, s. 297.
Please do not get caught up with aiding and abetting a crime, ask for the originating authority that may have the audacity to suggest that you cannot release them. Please do not obstruct justice, these documents are to be used in a test prior to criminal proceedings involving treason on the part of certain judges justices etc.
Please take the time to read the preamble to the Canadian Constitution and then read section 32.
This will tell you who is in charge as the first line tells you.
Looking forward to your reply in an expeditious manner as the reason for it's request is treason taking place in the courts and must be dealt with post haste.
Sincerely in defence of the faith and in God's light to cut the darkness
Minister of God
CC: Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth 011-44-207-839-5950
The Archbishop of Canterbury 011-01-227- 450964
Governor General Adrienne Clarkson 1-613-998-1664
Privy Council of Canada 1-613-992-3700
The House of Commons 1-613-992-1273
The Senate 1-613-992-1995
Prime Minister Jean Chretien 1-613-941-6900
Solicitor General Lawrence McAuly 1-613-952-2240
Justice Minister Mclellan 1-613-990-7255
Judith Beliss Director Judicial Affairs 1-613-990-7255
Elinor Caplan Immigration Minister 1-613-952-5533
Loreen Clark Immigration Adjudicator1-613-6666582
Elinor Caplan Minister of Immigration1-613-952-5533
Daphne Shaw-Dyck > Immigration Adjudication1-613-6666582
Anita Bascariol.Immigration Adjudicator1-613-6666582
The Governor General of Alberta Lois Hole
The Attorney General of Alberta Dave Hancock
Justice Costigan Alberta
Justice Belzil Alberta
Master Quinn Alberta
Canadian Council of Churches 1-416-236-4532
Cannabis Culture MAgazine 1-425-795-7189
Judges as Criminals
CIRCUIT COURT A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court of Cook County is a criminal enterprise. U.S. v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985).
The United States Supreme Court recently acknowledged the judicial corruption in Cook County, when it stated that Judge "Maloney was one of many dishonest judges exposed and convicted through 'Operation Greylord', a labyrinthine federal investigation of judicial corruption in Chicago". Bracey v. Gramley, case No. 96-6133 (June 9, 1997).
Since judges who do not report the criminal activities of other judges become principals in the criminal activity, 18 U.S.C. Section 1, and since no judges have reported the criminal activity of the judges who have been convicted, the other judges are as guilty as the convicted judges. The criminal activities that the Federal Courts found in the Circuit Court of Cook County still exist, and are today under the care, custody and control of Judge Greylord II (Chief Judge Donald O'Connell). The Circuit Court of Cook County
is a criminal enterprise
Judges have given themselves judicial immunity for their judicial functions. Judges have no judicial immunity for criminal acts, aiding, assisting, or conniving with others who perform a criminal act, or for their administrative/
ministerial duties. When a judge has a duty to act, he does not have discretion - he is then not performing a judicial act, he is performing a ministerial act.
Judicial immunity does not exist for judges who engage in criminal activity, for judges who connive with, aid and abet the criminal activity of another judge, or to a judge for damages sustained by a person who has been harmed by the judge's connivance with, aiding and abeting, another judge's criminal activity.
TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW
The Illinois Supreme Court has held that "if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers." Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)
Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court "could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, - it had no authority to make that finding." The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them. They acted without any jurisdiction.
When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law,and are engaged in treason (see below).
The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F.Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that "not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... it is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse."
When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judges orders are void, of no legal force or effect.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." [Emphasis supplied in original].
By law, a judge is a state officer.
The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).
VIOLATION OF OATH OF OFFICE
In Illinois, 705 ILCS 205/4 states "Every person admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law shall, before his name is entered upon the roll to be kept as hereinafter provided, take and subscribe an oath, substantially in the following form:
'I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be), that I will support the constitution of the United States and the constitution of the state of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of attorney and counselor at law to the best of my ability.'"
In Illinois, a judge must take a second oath of office. Under 705 ILCS 35/2 states, in part, that "The several judges of the circuit courts of this State, before entering upon the duties of their office, shall take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation, which shall be filed in the office of the Secretary of State:
'I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of judge of ______ court, according to the best of my ability.'"
Further, if the judge had enlisted in the U.S. military, then he has taken a third oath. Under Title 10 U.S.C. Section 502 the judge had subscribed to a lifetime oath, in pertinent part, as follows: "I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; ...".
The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.". Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958).
Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason.
Having taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason (see below).
If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.
Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)
What is the penalty for treason?
Citizens for Legal Responsibility suggest that the following judges may have acted without jurisdiction and therefore may have engaged in an act or acts of treason:
Judge Philip L. Bronstein
Justice Robert Chapman Buckley
Judge Grace G. Dickler
Judge Thomas C. Dudgeon (DuPage County)
Presiding Judge Timothy C. Evans
Judge Lester D. Foreman
Chief Judge Michael Galasso (DuPage County)
Justice Michael J. Gallagher
Judge Francis A. Gembala
Justice Thomas E. Hoffman
Judge Moshe Jacobius
Judge Thomas James
Judge Aubrey F. Kaplan
Judge Philip S. Lieb
Judge Veronica B. Mathein
Justice Sheila M. O'Brien
Chief Judge Donald O'Connell (Cook County)
Judge Edmund Ponce de Leon
Judge Daniel J. Sullivan
Justice Mary Jane Theis
Judge William F. Ward, Jr.
Any judge or attorney who does not report the above judges for treason as required by law may themselves be guilty of misprison of treason, 18 U.S.C. Section 2382.