See also: Stony Plain August 4th 2010 Asseveration/Affidavit of Criminal complaint (.doc) November 5, 2010 Hello minster Belanger here of the Church of the Ecumenical Redempotion International I wish all to be aware that despite my diligent efforts to communicate to Fran she said she never read my emails. I also sent her voice mail which she also ignored. I am trying to get her to respect my faith and beliefs that I do not need to physically show up in her office in submission to orders by a false oathed judge......Here is the false oath I showed her that she ignored and proceeded to intimdate me with threats I would have a warrent out for my arrest if I did not suybmit to the false oath orders... Now..From the Federal Oath of Allegiance Act that says ...read carefully and note the word "shall" is an imperative absolute. (1) Every person who, either of his own accord or in compliance with any lawful requirement made of the person, or in obedience to the directions of any Act or law in force in Canada, except the Constitution Act, 1867 and the Citizenship Act, desires to take an oath of allegiance shall have administered and take the oath in the following form, and no other: I, ...................., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors. So help me God. ( Notice no words saying "according to law") Now on to the oath all of the legislature of Alberta and it's employee's have taken for decades as well as all the lawyers and Judges and police. Alberta >> Statutes and Regulations >> Consolidated Statutes of Alberta >> OATHS OF OFFICE ACT for Alberta CHAPTER O-1 HER MAJESTY, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Alberta, enacts as follows: Oath of allegiance 1(1) When by a statute of Alberta a person is required to take an oath of allegiance it shall be taken in the following form: (Notice there is no word “Do” and no “Queen of Canada” and the words “According to law are not in the federal enactment”. I, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, her heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God. (2) Where the name of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second is expressed In the form, the name of the Sovereign at the time that the oath is taken Shall be substituted therefore if different. RSA 1970 c266 ss2,5,Form A Official oath 2 When by a statute of Alberta a person is required to take an official Oath on (a) Being appointed to an office other than that of judge or Justice of the peace, or (b) Being admitted to a profession or calling, the oath shall be taken in the following form: I, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , swear that I will diligently, faithfully and to the best of my ability execute according to law the office of . . . . . . . . . . . So help me God. RSA 1970 c266 s3,Form B Judicial oath 3 When by a statute of Alberta a person is required to take a judicial Oath on his appointment as a judge or as a justice of the peace, the oath Shall be taken in the following form: I, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , swear that I will honestly and faithfully and to the best of my ability exercise the powers and duties of a . . . . . . . . . . . . So help me God. RSA 1970 c266 s4,Form C;1975(2) c43 s5 Affirmation or declaration 4(1) A person who is required by a statute of Alberta to take an oath prescribed by this Act may make a solemn affirmation or declaration instead of taking the oath. (2) When on the administering of an oath prescribed by this Act the person about to take the oath is permitted by law to make a solemn affirmation or declaration instead of taking an oath, the person may make a solemn affirmation in the prescribed form of the oath, substituting the words "solemnly swear and truly declare and affirm" for the word "swear", and omitting the words "So help me God". RSA 1980 cO-1 s4;1990 c29 s19 You can all see the full exchange here,,,,,,http://allcreatorsgifts.blogspot.com/2010/11/lawful-excuse-for-failure-to-meet-with.html Thankyou all for being witness to my diligent efforts to gain this agreement...I left a message with Fran that I could not appear in her office as of my faith and beliefs to not submit to fraud nor impostors... I just talked to Fran Salidas and she said she has no time to check her email....She then intimidated me to submit myself to the fraud of false oathed judges....Do you as MLA's Support fraud? She thinks it is ok and intentionally intimidated me.... I want you all to be my witnesses to this...You wil be called upon to give evidense if I my freedom is taken from me by those who have no respect for my faith or the laws of God the Queen defends... The oath is false ladies and gentlemen! Why do you support a false oath?? November 4, 2010 Hello Fran, I thankyou for agreeing I need not come to your office....Tacit consent is well recognised in law...As you may relay the emails and messages I left you made you irrefutably aware of the false oath and my religious convictions to not to submit to impostors. Please direct me to your supervisor as I wish to expand awareness of the fraud and treason taking place within Justice and the Solicitor Generals office by providing them proof of the false oath....No one has authority to intimidate you to conspire with a fraud or treason by submitting to it.....Any authority obtained via a false oath is void abinitio... Here is the case in the Texas supreme court regarding that very issue,,...http://www.freedom-school.com/acceptance/prieto-bail-bonds.pdf Be it known I am not a criminal for not submitting to fraud treason conversion breach of trust and personation....The criminals are those who allowed judges prosecutors and lawyers to swear false oaths since 1955...Go ask David Hancock and Neil Skinner...They are aware and admitted to me I was correct so have several judges from the bench....They and several JP's who refused to process a private information in violation of section 9 of their Criminal code are aware as well..They said they weere low man on the totem pole and that those who I wished to file an information against were their superiors and they were in conflict...Just that alone is evidense of the corruption that allows men charding as Judges to intimidate menn to violate the laws of the Bible by threats of punishment and imprisonment...A man named Caffaro and Peter Ayotte two in point as well as a man named Pahl that seemed in no fear to intimidate me to violate YHVH's commands,,,,Included is the criminal complaint sent to all the Top men and women acting as Judges. Michelle your predessesor got one and I believe that put her in conflict so she had to quit... I will not and cannot be compelled to participate by submission to the corrupted judiciary of Alberta nor prosecutors who have no respect for my sincere faith in the King James Bible as the laws of YHVH....The Queen swore to defend them with all of her power, will you act a true allegiant to aid her or admit treason by your actions to intimidate mer to violate YHVH's law... Until I see a valid oath of Allegiance and the man or woman submits to me that they know true allegiance to the Defender of the Faith is to aid her to defend the laws of God I have no intention of submitting to nthe threat duress and intimidation which is caused me great stress and anxiety....You have no power to do that to me....I have never harmed anyone....I will not harm anyone, I do submit to you I do not consent for you to harm me as I am a private man with an upper and lower case name not being the security in All capital letters the crown wants me to stand in place for...That is fraud and conversion... Risk management will be notified of the claim... Where is your authority that supercedes God?? Blessings.. October 31, 2010 Greetings ,Fran, I just wanted you to know that others from my church will be contacting you to confirm our agreement that I have indeed shown you my lawful excuse to not appear in your office and for you to act as eternal witness to the potential intimidation to do a thing I have a right and freedom in Christ not to submit to... You have not refuted my offer of my lawful excuse to not appear that was done in honor.....I know you believe that men acting as judges are incapable of error but I did show you they have invalid oaths proving they are impostors... I know you do not wish to jeopardise your fidelity bond and join in on the conspiracy those faking true allegiance to a Christian monarch are engaged in....Treason is a very serious allegation and I am prepared to support it with all the facts that make it impossible for the impostors to prove wrong.. .I thankyou sincerely for not refuting my notice to you and thankyou for your acceptance of the facts and notifying your superior....Blessings upon knowing it is lawful for me not to appear as long as I have given you my lawful excuse....I can think of no better reason for not submitting to impostors other than they have sworn false oaths as I provide you with and have added to and removed ferom YHVH's law in violoation of Deuteronomy 4:2 and I know it will not be your attempt to intimidate me to correspond with the fraud extortion and treason which as alowed them to take the value of my name by conversion and trade it on the stock exchange...You may have never had a man of faith exposing fraud before you like this but it is my sincere hope I will not be the last in exposing you to the fraud misprison of treason breach of trust and obstruction of a minister engaged in the official functions of his calling immune from intimidationand nuisance by not so public officials as since the system is basd upon fale oaths they are but private men and women that are privately liable to me for any damages to the ability to practice my faith and beleifes in the laws of YHVH as prime and and damages that result in the limitation of my liberty inChrist.. If you have any information that can prove those impostors have some kind of authority to be on the bench with false oaths or that they ahve auhtority to suprecede the laws of YHVH please forward them to me as if you do nt I will assume you have conceded you ahve no athority to intimidate me to correspond to bogus orders and submit to treasonous activitees.... Please do not as is commonly suggested by superiors attempt to ignore my notices offered in good faith as I have been xcollecting witnesses who will let you know they are watching to see if you act in honor or not..incidently my coaccused who has no conditions no bail and was evictted from Fort Saskatchewan correctional facility has admitted that the gift of god was in his care when we were obstructed by the RCMP....He has no probation officer and needs not to report yet hsi record is as bad as mine...Any orders I signed were offered under protest of threat dures and intimidation as per U.D.I. beside my autograph on each form I signed....That invalidates the agreement as no agreemernt can be held as valid if it is obtained under threat duress and intimidation... Blessings upon knowing I am not going anywhere and wish to remain in communication with you as I am claiming you as my witness in this excellent exchange..Thankyou for your cooperation in not disputing my lawful excuse and your acceptance of the proof I provided that the men and women acting as judges in the province have false oaths and are impostors.... Bidding you goodbye in Yahushua's name.... On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:52 PM, minister Belanger <owlmon@gmail.com> wrote: Thankyou Fran for your offer..... |