The reason we have definite written rules is to combat the arguments...

**The following exerpt from a 1796 US (North Carolina) Court case tells us
the true status of government laws relative to free will men: *

*The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any
law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than
corporate artificial and natural persons and the contracts between them.* *

*Therefore, because "government" cannot force a free will human to be a
corporate member, even though they use deception to entrap people into the
status of "subject/slave" natural person, they do have to make an "exit
door" available. That "exit door" is found buried in some government act. In
the USA, it is in the Uniform Commercial Code, and in Canada, it is in the
Criminal Code.
[Thanks to the research efforts of a commercially oriented man named Robert
*Readers please take note that We have in place a British Monarch anointed
in ceremony to the defense of the Bible that provides the "real" exit door,
being you exercising your faith. Robert Menard is not fond of that fact
for some unexplained reason.

*Disobeying a statute
Sec. 126 (1) Every one who, **without lawful excuse**, contravenes an Act
of Parliament by wilfully doing anything that it forbids or by wilfully
omitting to do anything that it requires to be done is, unless a punishment
is expressly provided by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to
imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F). *

*Disobeying order of court
Sec. 127. (1) Every one who, **without lawful excuse**, disobeys a lawful
order made by a court of justice or by a person or body of persons
authorized by any Act to make or give the order, other than an order for the
payment of money, is, unless a punishment or other mode of proceeding is
expressly provided by law, guilty of (a) an indictable offence and liable to
imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or (b) an offence
punishable on summary conviction. *

**Rob points out that in mans laws those corporate officers of written
deception offer these words* in some jurisdictions, as in New Zealand, the
**"*without lawful excuse*"** is replaced with the phrase **"*without claim
of right*"**. *

*This then explains the use of Section 39 of the Criminal Code of Canada
which says: **"*Defence with claim of right*"** *

*(1) Every one who is in peaceable possession of personal property **under
a claim of right**, and every one acting under his authority, is protected
from criminal responsibility for defending that possession, even against a
person entitled by law to possession of it, if he uses no more force than is
necessary. *

*This also suggests that there are no true 'judicial' courts for the 'free
will people' of the united States of America [and Canada]. All courts are
'administrative' ( All 'judges' are officers of the make-believe ship called
a State or of the UNITED STATES - executive branch of government) for
'contract adjudication'. *There MUST BE a contract in place between the
parties in dispute and the 'arbitrator judge' for a judge to act as
arbitrator. **

*This means that the summons or arrest warrant and trial are by contract
of the accused with the Clerk of the Court; and another contract between the
judge and the accused for the offer of sentence. *

**And, a primary point here is that for a contract to be valid, it must be
voluntary by all parties concerned. This is true for both maritime and
common law. If the accused refuses to volunteer to be tried or sentenced, in
a timely manner, then the case cannot lawfully proceed. This applies to
anything from a jay-walking ticket to murder.* *

**So, if we want a so called true justice system, we are told we must
install a proper
Anglo-Saxon Common Law justice system*, with the requirements as stated in
the Magna Carta of England created in 1215 and confirmed in 1225. * *that
is unless we accept God's offer of his law as Supreme which Magna Carta
attempts to reinvent.
*The present system of so-called justice makes traitors, murderers,
kidnappers, unlawful confiners, assaulters, extortionists, mobsters and
thieves of ALL men or women acting as Popes, royalty, politicians,
presidents, governors, lawyers, judges, court clerks, police, prison guards,
etc. There is no other catagory in which to place them. This is the ugly
Roman system that has been imposed upon America and the other countries of
the British Empire, all in accord with the Popes of Rome and the British
Monarchy.** *

*Learn the facts about the Vatican's and British Crown's continued claimed
ownership of the USA; and, their continued collection of 'tribute' from
Americans through the Pope's 'Holy Roman Empire'.*

*The reason we have definite written rules is to combat the arguments of
stupid and opinionated men…….and women acting as men.*

*Oh yes and to control and make use of those ignorant to God's law and the
meaning of the written words*.